Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

Carmen Lawence on the politics of fear « Previous | |Next »
October 25, 2006

In the 'Fear of the Other' chapter of her excellent Fear and Politics Carmen Lawrence makes the following remark:

Inflamatory remarks by federal ministers who have demanded that migrants who do not accept Australian values should leave or face deportation have contributed to this climate of fear. At a time when our leaders should be calming fears, they are playing on them. When they should be doing all they can to to help us to see events from the other's perspective, they are inviting us to retreat into our own narrow identities. When they should be assisting us to recognize how our own actions and words can cause fear in others they are giving signals that such sensitivities are unimportant. They are in my view, playing with fire. p.37

Yes the ministers in the Howard Government are playing with fire. But the conservative strategy is not to calm fears. It is designed to divide the nation through activating fears in the electorate. It is divide and rulestrategy that repudiates the notion of a poltical centre. The strategy is designed to ensure the re-election fo the Howard government because the conservative mood of the Australian electorate in an anarchic, globalised world will ensure that the Coalition is continually re-elected by a small majority. Retaining power is the name of the game. Conservatives appeal to the "values voters."

While Australia is safer, we are not yet safe" (and the strategy is to ensure that we never will be.) Hence we have the global war on terrorism/long war/war against violent extremism/war to save civilization from the Islamofascist menace etc etc. It an Australian version of Karl Rove's strategy of one-party rule through building a right-wing dynasty that could dominate American politics for decades; the assertion of a long-term Republican hegemony and the complete dismantling of the Democratic Party to ensure that Republicans control U.S. politics and policy for at least the next 30 years. So we have wedge politics, the use of the Christian right and mega churches as useful idiots; using whatever means necessary to divide the enemy, usurp their message, convince supporters that the enemy was an agent of satanic forces; to manipulate and mobilize "the base," so as to allow a candidate to forget about "the middle."

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:33 PM | | Comments (5)
Comments

Comments

The ALP is just as bad when it comes to 'scare campaigns' of course. In 1993 and 1998 they ran almost totally on fear campaigns against the GST, and I suspect they want to try the same in 2007 with industrial relations.

Then there's Green politics, which has a lot of 'end of the world' fear-mongering and God-bothering door-knocking Jehovahs Witnesses that knock on my door and annoy me.

Worst of the lot though, I reckon, are the slimebags from the 'wellness' industries and the fat pharmacueticals, doctors lobbies and the rest of the nanny-state ninnies. Don't eat this, don't drink that, dont have fun, stand up, sit down, BE CAREFUL!!!!

They are all after your dollar or your vote, and they make me vomit.

Simon,
yes you can see that around the comments being made by Labor politicians about Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali praising Jihadists.

I saw a media grab of Arch Bevins says the mufti has broken the law by attacking the troops in Iraq. The federal Opposition demanded that the Government investigate whether Sheik Hilali's support of jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan constituted treason

Not even the PM says the mufti has broken the law with his comments. or willing to talk in terms of treason.

Treason? I'm no lawyer, but I don't think you'd have to be Horace Rumpole to defend Hilali on that one.

Simon,
I know. It's about free speech and a robust right to criticise Australian values and policies. Sheik Taj al-Din al-Hilali didn’t do anything which directly harmed another person. I don't see things that he has said anything to incite violence that inflicts suffering on others.

Though Sheik Taj al-Din al-Hilali may be called mufti of Australia his only authority is as imam of the Lakemba Mosque in Sydney.He does not represent the diverse Muslim communities of Australia and he would embarrass a lot of Muslims in Melbourne.

So its quite odd to see the ALP going way over the top playing dog whistle politics the palys into the anti-Muslim sentiment that exists in the community and media.

Oh, not really. The ALP has to win elections as well, and they have to make some sort of statement to redneck Australia that they care about rednecks as well. The Muslims might not like it, but with preferential voting, what are they going to do about it?

You can argue that it is amoral of the ALP to act in this way, and they sure are hamfisted about the way that they have done it. But after a decade in opposition, I doubt the ALP give a toss about 'morality'.