http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/philosophy/000544.html There is post here and here on development and the environment at public opinion. By development public opinion means wealth creation, increased GNP, and rising standards of living. Good development (economic growth), means a good performance in increasing wealth, GNP and standards of living. But development has an international context and a wider economic interpretation; one associated with the Washington consensus (US Treasury, IMF, World Bank etc). Joseph Steiglitz says that the Washington consensus held that good economic performance can be achieved through liberalized trade, macro-economic stability( controlling inflation, reducing the budget deficit etc) and getting prices right. Once big government got out of the way, private markets would allocate resoruces efficiently and generate robust growth. The Washington consensus, which has ben bought lock, stock and barrel by the Australian Treasury, is all about making markets work and to hell with everything else. The emphasis is on devising the instruments en-us http://www.viatical-senior-life-settlements.com/ I\'m with you but from where I stand (I\'m a viatical life settlement broker) there\'s not much to say. Know what I mean? http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/opinion/001286.php Can we gain an insight into the Latham-led ALP stance on the free trade agreement with the US from the http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/opinion/000598.php I see that Peter Costello has been wearing his conservative public philosopher hat again. He was speaking as the Federal http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/opinion/000551.php You rarely see a debate about the causes of unsustainability in the mass media in Australia. What you do see