<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Foucault</title>
<link>http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/philosophy/2005/10/post_18.html</link>
<description>The following quote is from this paper by Brad Stone about some recently published lectures courses by Foucault. "Society Must Be Defended" is probably best thought of as a genealogical text dealing with the emergence of modern biopower through the notion of race. In this essay, race is viewed as a discursive concept, and therefore placed within what I believe is the larger archaeological goal of the lectures: the archaeology of historico-political discourse. This discourse is discontinuous with the philosophico-juridical discourse of Machiavelli and Hobbes and the Classical notion of history, whose purpose was to legitimize sovereignty through an "impartial" retelling of past events. Historico-political discourse, however, holds that impartiality is impossible, that truths (especially historical truths) are based on which side of the battle one is on. Foucault's historico-political discourse is against sovereignity. It is: "...a discourse that cuts off the king's head, or which at least does without...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Www.dangerousdongs.com</title>
<link>http://www.hispec.com/pric30/</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.hispec.com/pris11/addressees.html">Www.tunaparty.com</a> Weekly www.tunaparty.com <a href="http://www.hispec.com/pag09/">top shelf pussy</a> English-Dutch top shelf pussy.]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>