<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Hegel vs the neocons</title>
<link>http://www.sauer-thompson.com/archives/philosophy/000169.html</link>
<description>I have been wandering in cyberspace late at night and I came across an entry by Jim at Philosoblog on Hegel, which had been posted about a month ago. Jim says: "Eddie and Aaron have Hegel on tap. I wouldn't go with Aaron's line that all of Hegel is gibberish; Philosophy of Right says something. But I've read The Phenomenology of Spirit twice, and it's mad. Yet, Eddie's batting for Hegel. He's right about one thing: Schopenhauer was just bitter. I heard that the poor bastard had to lecture to only one or two students while Hegel's lectures were standing room only." Eddie has effectively dealt with Aaron's claim that Hegel is gibberish, the various remarks in the comment boxes and the post by Arthur Silber over at Cold Fury called The Importance of Understanding Hegel. Eddie did a good job in highlighting the standard cliched interpretations of Hegel's texts.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>texas holdem</title>
<link>http://www.texas----holdem.us</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href='http://www.hold-em-online.us'>texas hold'em</a> <a href='http://www.texas----holdem.us'>texas holdem</a> <a href='http://www.hold--em.us'>texas hold'em</a> <a href='http://www.on-line--poker.us'>online poker</a>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>