March 05, 2007
Why does the Canberra Press Gallery focus almost exclusively on the Rudd issue and not on political lobbying? Why is the latter ignored, when Brian Burke stands for the deep corruption at the heart to political lobbying? Don't we need an accountability framework that regulates the lobbying industry?

Alan Moir
There seems to be an assumption amongst the Canberra Press Gallery that lobbying is the preferred mean for exerting political influence in Australian liberal democracies and corruption the preferred one in Indonesia. Lobbying and corruption don't mix in Australia, even though Brian Burke indicates the very opposite. Isn't Brian Burke Australia's equivalent of Jack Abramoff in the US? Or is Perth seen as the capital for political corruption, and that is all that needs to be said?
The Canberra Press Gallery--eg., Matt Price in The Australia talks in terms of Burke's perverted political influence whilst saying that Burke and Grill were deftly able to cut through endless red tape and set up meetings with key bureaucrats and MPs. So when--ie., at what point--does legitimate lobbying become perverted lobbying and the Westminster system in Western Australia becomes compromised? What sort of accountability framework to regulate the lobby industry do we need?
Can we talk in terms of gangster capitalism yet? Is that what is emerging in WA?
|
Very pertinent observations, I believe, and not to my knowledge made in the MSM.
Money and politics, always a very nice fit, are always in need of accountability mechanisms, which in this instance of lobbying do not seem to exist.
Then their is the attraction of the industry for former politicians to carry on insider trading. And yet Burke and Grill are seemingly effective offering win/win outcomes, winning the suppoort of business, despite the bans by the premiers.