Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

Seneca: On the Happy Life « Previous | |Next »
January 03, 2007

This is a quote from Seneca's essay On the Happy Life, where he is arguing for virtue against pleasure:

Let virtue go first, let her bear the standard. We shall none the less have pleasure, but we shall be the master and control her; at times we shall yield to her entreaty, never to her constraint. But those who surrender the leadership to pleasure, lack both; for they lose virtue, and yet do not possess pleasure, but are possessed by it, and they are either tortured by the lack of it or strangled by its excess - wretched if it deserts them, more wretched if it overwhelms them - they are like sailors who have been caught in the waters around the Syrtes, and now are left on the dry shore, and again are tossed by the seething waves. But this results from a complete lack of self- control and blind love for an object; for, if one seeks evils instead of goods, success becomes dangerous. As the hunt for wild beasts is fraught with hardship and danger, and even those that are captured are an anxious possession - for many a time they rend their masters - so it is as regards great pleasures; for they turn out to be a great misfortune, and captured pleasures become now the captors. And the more and the greater the pleasures are, the more inferior will that man be whom the crowd calls happy, and the more masters will he have to serve.

It is a passage that has relevance today. It can be interpreted as directed at those utilitarian hedonists (Epicureans) who maintain that the pleasures of the market give us a happy and fulfilled life. The happy life, for them, is the most pleasant or pleasurable life. Seneca is concerned with how we should live.

Seneca's classical Stoic response is that happineness is secured by the good, virtue is what is good, and virtue is the human excellences. It is within the Socratic tradition's concern with the importance of improving one's character to make possible the living of a happy life. This requires a lot of work for ordinary human beings as distinct from sages. As Dr. K. H. Seddon says Seneca offers guidance and techiques for self-improvement to help:

find new and improved perspectives on one’s specific concerns, to arrive eventually at a point where our worries are defeated, or our fears abolished, and our passions tempered. The endeavour to do this, and to live abiding by the insights attained constituted living as a philosopher.

This involves a transformation.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 05:48 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

Gary, These two items by my favourite "philosopher" provide a unique understanding on the origins & consequences of the urge to Happiness with a capital H.

1. www.dabase.net/happytxt.htm
2. www.dabase.net/dualsens.htm

Epicurus often gets a bad wrap for his philosophy, but it is too often misrepresented.

Sure, Epicurus believed pleasure was what made as happy, but he certainly didn't believe the market had anything to do with that.

In fact, Epicurus was the first philosopher I know of to talk of the distortionary effect the market and the accumulation of goods has on our evaluation of what gives us pleasure.

Whilst he certainly was perhaps the first utilitarian, his calculations concluded that a life of simplicity, neither overindulgent or ascetic is what will most likely provide us with the most overall pleasure.

In effect, he was an advocate of Aristotle's middle way. For instance, he believed one should constantly nibble so that one neither gets hungry nor fully satiated.

Antonios
you are right. Epicurus agrees with Aristotle that happiness is the highest good. He disagrees with Aristotle by identifying happiness with pleasure. He does acknolwedge that virtue is necesary for happiness --virtues for Epicurus are instrumental, in that is, they are valuable solely for the sake of the happiness that they can bring oneself, not for their own sake. The virtues are ultimately forms of prudence, of calculating what is in one's own best interest.

I was sloppy. In trying to show that Seneca was worth reading today vis-a-vis the market hedonists I set Epicurus up as a straw dog. As he says:

It is impossible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and honorably and justly, and it is impossible to live wisely and honorably and justly without living pleasantly. Whenever any one of these is lacking, when, for instance, the man is not able to live wisely, though he lives honorably and justly, it is impossible for him to live a pleasant life.

I simply played on the traditional alleged incompatibility of pleasure with virtue. I highlighted Epicurus' ethics as a form of egoistic hedonism; (i.e., the only thing that is intrinsically valuable is one's own pleasure; anything else that has value is valuable merely as a means to securing pleasure for oneself.)

I ignored that Epicurus has a sophisticated view of the nature of pleasure which leads him to recommend a virtuous, moderately ascetic life as the best means to securing pleasure. Consequently, Epicurus' conception of pleasure differs from that of the utilitarians.

I was just using the 'pleasures are good and pain is bad link to utilitarianism and the underlying atomism to make Seneca relevant to an Epicurean-oriented individualism in politics, philosophy, and popular culture.

 
Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)