Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

public language#4 « Previous | |Next »
February 23, 2004

In Death Sentence Don Watson gives a good description of the way that language is used within the friend/enemy political machinery of parliamentary politics. He writes:


"In the diabolical environment of politics, unreasoning forces forces throw up unreasoning things like red herrings and dead cats and fling them in the path of journalists. Politicians come forth willing to say anything, and without regard to ordinary civility. Their opponents are rank hypocrites, they say: they've heinous secret plans that all the outward signs disguise. And often it emerges that these outrageous accusations have some truth about them, because politics does throw up hypocrites and liars. In keeping with the evolution of such political animals, among journalists horrible cynics emerge. "

It's a reasonable account. You only have to watch a "debate" in the House of Representatives online to see this kind of low life (slimeballs) in action. And all the posturing, ranting and tirade of abuse is done with an eye to the camera on broadcast day. It's called getting your message across ; or getting your through to the electorate.

It looks so different watching it at the other end of the camera. It turns you off. If you listen to several hours of this on the computer you realize that most of them are parroting the party line to score petty political points. You know they have nothing to say when they suddenly puff themselves up, become all impassioned and go about how evil the other side is and wonderful their side is.

There is no policy making being done here.

So what are the consequences of this use of language by instrumental reason? Watson gives a good account. He says:


"For the [public] language the consequences are terrible: catchalls, cliches, and nauseating platitudes are all rolled out. Syntax is mangled. Reason goes up in smoke. The truth is less significant than the political contest. The question is not, Which is the better argument? It is Who won? Or What was the outcome? Along with reason and enlightenment language goes out the window."

The irony, of course, is that the fervent supporters of neo-liberalism, economic reform and globalization said they stood for the liberal values, reason and enlightenment. It was their old-fashioned social democratic opponents who stood for prejudice, tradition and irrationality. And yet their use of language indicated that they had no time for enlightenment, let alone understood what that cultural heritage of dialogic reason, democracy and citizenship meant.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 5:09 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (1)
TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference public language#4:

» Tim Blair's darned sock from Public Opinion
I'm currently reading Don Watson's Death Sentence:The Decay of Public Language. I was thinking about writing a post on the [Read More]

 
Comments