Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

Australian Strategic Policy Debate « Previous | |Next »
October 15, 2004

This a good pice of work. Paul Monk contests the standard argument in Australian strategic thinking advanced by Paul Dibb, that dealing with terorism after 9/11 is a police matter not a military one for nation states.

Monk argues this by considering Philip Bobbitt's' thesis advanced in his 'The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History.' Bobbitt argues that the dangers which have arisen in recent years are every bit as great as those we have just faced down. They are all the more so for being of a different nature to the threats faced down in the Cold War and characterized by unprecedented uncertainty. Bobbitt argues that the new dangers will compel profound reassessments of the nature of ‘national’ security itself and, with it, the civil laws, force structures and rules of engagement that buttress such security.

This means that our classical strategies of deterrence based on retaliation will have to be rethought. Bobbitt says that we need to move our thinking from:


"... threat-based strategies that rely on knowing precisely who our enemy is and where he lives, to vulnerability-based strategies that try to make our infrastructure more slippery, more redundant, more versatile, more difficult to attack…There will be no final victory in such a war. Rather, victory will consist in having the resources and the ingenuity to avoid defeat. So long, however, as states rely on a deterrence and retaliation model for their strategic paradigms – that is, a model that requires a threat-based analysis – they will inevitably neglect those steps, including enhanced intelligence collection, pre-emption, the development of defensive systems (including sensors), vaccinations, the pre-positioning of medical supplies and advanced methods of deception that provide the basis for operating within a different paradigm, one that relies on a vulnerability analysis.”

He suggest that unless such changes begin, in anticipation of what could now happen at any time, we could face a catastrophic breakdown in global order.


| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:53 PM | | Comments (0)
Comments