Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

liberal multiculturalism? « Previous | |Next »
February 4, 2006

Of interest. It claims that liberalism has no need of multiculturalism in that liberal multiculturalism is neither a necessary nor a convincing extension of liberalism is the argument.

Anke Schuster says that:

Liberal multiculturalists...advocate multiculturalism on the basis of liberal values. As moderate multiculturalists, liberal proponents of the politics of recognition wish to avoid both the collectivism of radical multiculturalism and the exaggerated individualism associated with liberalism. Liberal multiculturalists retain the liberal emphasis on the individual by claiming that recognising cultural difference is essential for the individual and thus for individual equality. While a liberal perspective is constitutive of these philosophers' self-conception, there are significant differences between the two main strands of liberal multiculturalism.

Most liberal multiculturalists argue along either of the two lines or combine arguments so as to create a broader theoretical foundation.

I have to be suprised by this kind of liberal response to the realities of multiculturalism. I'm not sure of the motivation. Is it a concern that liberal (individual) equality is undermined by multiculturalism, with its concerns about difference, cultural recognition and communal belonging? Multicultural Australia does challenge classical liberalism as Liberal multiculturalism is highlights that there is more to human difference than the notion of differing conceptions of the good is able to capture, and that there is therefore more to social justice than fair distribution of resources and equal chances for individuals.
So why place the block between liberalism and multiculturalism?

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:52 PM | | Comments (2)
Comments

Comments

I agree with Anke Schuster. I divided social organisation into three parts; intrinsic, emergant and dispossesive. A Liberal would not see the emergant as valid, while a Conservative would see the intrinsic and emergant being synonymous. I argued that an Australian Republican would see the intrinsic being vital for the emergant to appear.


Cameron,
I'm not convinced.

Liberalism to be relevant must make sense of political realities---ie. a multicultural society. That is what Australia, Canadia and the US have become from the processes of globalization.

My emphasis on historical becoming is at odds with your contractarian (Lockean) understanding of liberalism that denies emergence of new forms of life.