Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

interpreting the Australian constitution « Previous | |Next »
April 12, 2008

In this review of George William's Human Rights under the Australian Constitution in the Melbourne University Law Review by Glenn Patmore and Mathew Harding highlight William' analysis of the methodology of constitutional interpretation.They say that in chapter four, which is called ‘Constitutional Interpretation and Human Rights’. Williams follows the development of constitutional interpretation from Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd to the present.

He argues that the legalism and, more particularly, the literalism for which the Engineers’ Case stands, is a mask that the Court employs to disguise in value neutral terms what are in reality judgments based on policy and judicial values. By ‘legalism’ Williams means a close adherence to legal reasoning that creates ‘a reliance on technical solutions rather than considerations of policy.’...] Williams illustrates the impossibility of a pure literalism with a clever observation about the Engineers’ Case itself. He reveals that in rejecting the use of US authority as a proper source of guidance in constitutional interpretation, the majority in the Engineers’ Case actually relied upon non-textual considerations...

Williams continues by arguing that literalism has been gradually eroded by other interpretive concepts developed by the Court. Patmore and Harding say that in the conclusion to chapter four:
Williams contends that the selective application of literalism by the High Court has led to an ‘unarticulated tendency’ to defer to the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. Such an approach is no less political than one which seeks openly to foster human rights; it simply has different objectives. Furthermore, in a post-legalist era, when new concepts are beginning to inform constitutional interpretation, the Court has not developed a consistent approach, and as a result ‘[t]here is no articulated vision for constitutional rights in Australia.’

The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty becomes a bedrock of conservative jurisprudence.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 4:58 PM | | Comments (1)
Comments

Comments

So-called "human rights" have absolutely no relevance to the Australian legal system unless our parliaments explictly pass legislation incorporating them.