Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

Foucault & governmentality « Previous | |Next »
October 25, 2004

Thomas Lemke's book, A Critique of Political Reason: Foucault's Analysis of Modern Governmentality look to be a very interesting text indeed. Governmentality is the link between Foucault's exploration of the political rationalites and genealogies of the state and the techniques of domination on the one hand, and his exploration of ethics, the genealogies of the subject and the technologies of subjectivity on the other. Governmentality links the formation of the state and the formation of the subject.

I have tried looking for Foucault's lecture courses on governmentality on the internet off and on, but I've come up with nothing much. As I understand it Foucault gave two courses of lectures around 1978 and 1979. at the College of France. The 1978 lecture course is a genealogy of governmentality from the classical Greeks and Romans through the Christian idea of pastoral guidance to the idea of state reason and the police in the 18th century. The 1979 lecture course explored the social market (German Ordo)liberal and the neo-liberal (Chicago School) forms of governmentality. It is a pity that these lecture courses are not online, as the 1979 lecture series ---summarized by Lemke here ---looks to be interesting. These lecture series (audio only?) should be online.

In the meantime the Foucauldian Reflections weblog run by Ali Rivzi fills the online gap. The weblog is very good and thoroughly recommended. Ali is also in the process of developing a resource site that provides a wealth of articles by and about Foucault. So things are beginning to shift in terms of online resources.

My understanding of governmentality is gained from reading some of the above lectures several years ago.I'm interested in governmentality as it connects academic theory with public policy and political power in a fruitful way. I've found the governmentality approach to be particularly useful for understanding how neo-liberalism works to govern (shape the conduct of) populations through the deregulated market that take the whole of society as their domain, governing the environment through community, and the practices of social medicine as a system of power and economics. Governmentality gives us is the idea of neo-liberalism as a political project that creates a political economic reality that it says exists.

I have not read Lemke's book. So I am working from his summary of this text. Lemke starts off by saying that the body/power Foucault of Discipline and Punish tended to identify power with discipline. The relations of power are understood in terms of war, struggle and conflict not law, legitimation, will and consensus. Foucault reversed the juridical model of power centred around sovereignty and during the 1980s he took a lot of flak from Anglo-American liberal critics (Habermas, Taylor, Walzer) for this reductionism. They highlighted the gaps, contradictions and aporias in Foucult's work on power and drew attention to the tension between his empirical insights into the modern mechanisms of power and normative problems associated with saying that domination and discipline was bad. Hence an effective critique of the use of power was undermined.

In the second part of his book entitled 'Governmentality' Lemke shows:


"....how Foucault significantly changes his conception of power: the importance of discipline is relativated with respect to macropolitical phenomenons (bio-politics); the war-model, that he prefered and opposed to the juridical model, is questioned and finally critized for being reductive."

So Foucualt takes the criticisms on board and then revises his understanding of how power in a liberal society actually works. What replaces the earlier disciplinary model of power is governmentality. Governmentality is an important category shift.

What then is governmentality?

Lemke says that:


'This is the point where the notion of government appears. Foucault uses this term to solve both problems that are insufficiently treated in the "microphysics of power:" government takes up the question of the government of the self (the problem of the subject) and articulates at the same time the problem of the government of the others (the problem of politics and the state).

Foucault "discovers" a new dimension of power: government does not operate as "right" or as "war"; it works foremost as a "conduct of conducts."'


By conduct of conducts in a liberal society Foucault the practices (conduct) of a population and our subjectivity. An example is how neo-liberalism weans us off our social democratic reliance on state provision of services, and shapes the unemployed through welfare to work programs to become more self-reponsible and entrepreneurial.

Lemke rightly says that this perspective of politics as governmentality is especially useful to analysing the ongoing transformations of the welfare state that are linked to the appearence of new "neoliberal" forms of subjectivity associated with the welfare-to work-policies that target the unemployed, the disabled and single mothers.

In the third part of his hbook, which is entitled 'Politics and Ethics', Lemke says that:


"I try to show that Foucault's interest in subjectivity and ethics in his later work does not signify that he breaks with his analytics of power. On the very contrary: government is the notion that links the ways subjects conduct themselves ("ethics") with forms of power and domination."

Governmentality is concerned to ensure the right conduct of a population in a deregulated market and to shape new forms of (entrepreneurial) subjectivity. In governmentality the ethics and the politics are deeply intertwined.

I appreciate that this is a very condensed summary of some complex material, but I think that it is enough to highlight the importance and the significance of governmentality for a history of the present.

A paper by Lemke for those interested. It provides more background on governmentality and highlights the way that the contact point of the state governing others is also the contact point for our self-regulation.

next

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 6:16 PM | | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (3)
TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Foucault & governmentality:

» a quote from Public Opinion
From an editorial in the New Left Review by Alexander Cockburn. Cockburn is commenting on the US Presidential elections: "As [Read More]

» The Ruins of the University from Troppo Armadillo
Lately, we've heard an enormous amount about elites, (aka latte sippers). A project for the future might be a post to put to rest this tenacious fallacy forever (I live in hope generally...). Often these dreaded elites are associated... [Read More]

» I'm reading from Public Opinion
I've started reading Michael Keating's Who Rules: How Government retains control of a privatised economy. John Quiggin has read the... [Read More]

 
Comments

Comments

Hi Gary,

Thanks for mentioning my blog. Lemke is certainly a very interesting guy. He is normally lumped together with the so called governmentality school but is way different from them.

As far as I know, the book you mention, as of now, only exists in German language; however it would be great to have it in English. The paper you have posted from Rethinking Marxism should give a very good idea of the content of the book.

Regards
Ali

Ali,
you run some pretty good blogs there. Keep the impressive work up.

I was delighted to discover them, as I thought that I was the only person trying to write philosophy blogs in Australia. I will certainly be making use of the resources that you provide for us non-scholars.

I will have a look at Lemke's 'Foucault, Governmentality and Critique' paper latter, when I have more time. He certainly has a great site.

I'd found the governmentality school (Nicolas Rose, Graham Burchell) etc:--
*Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne & Nikolas Rose, eds., 'Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Governmentality,' (London: UCL Press, Chicago: Chicago University Press)
*Nikolas Rose, Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought (Cambridge University Press, 1999);
*Mitchell Dean, Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (Sage, London, 1999);
*Mitchell Dean, Mitchell and Barry Hindess, (eds) Governing Australia, (1998, Melbourne, CUP)---

interesting but thin, when I read them in the late 1990s. They were more concerned with elaborating Foucault's ideas than using his tool box to help us make sense of the historical present.

I also found them more sociological in orientation than philosophical, and so they were giving us an academic kind of historical sociology. A lot of it was boring.

The critical edge seems to disappear as a Foucault governmentality school formed within academia.