Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
hegel
"When philosophy paints its grey in grey then has a shape of life grown old. By philosophy's grey in grey it cannot be rejuvenated but only understood. The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk." -- G.W.F. Hegel, 'Preface', Philosophy of Right.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Links - weblogs
Links - Political Rationalities
Links - Resources: Philosophy
Public Discussion
Resources
Cafe Philosophy
Philosophy Centres
Links - Resources: Other
Links - Web Connections
Other
www.thought-factory.net
'Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainity and agitation distinquish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.' Marx

Nietzsche + the Enlightenment tradition « Previous | |Next »
March 31, 2010

A useful insight into ethics in modernity from the last chapter of R. Kevin Hill's Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of his Thought entitled 'The Ruins of Reason?' He says:

...modernity shares a commitment to Enlightenment morality, to the empowerment of the individual cut free from the authoritative moorings of tradition and religion. Not only does the Enlightenment seek to champion human freedom lacking such moorings, it sees the moorings as bonds to be broken. The problem of how to structure a community that does not dissolve into anarchy in the face of this individualism leads to Kant’s notion of morality as a neutral framework for preventing the clash of wills from destroying each other. Though Kant is not the only figure to articulate these themes, he is arguably the most persuasive, and in his later incarnation as Rawls, among the most popular.

He argues that Nietzsche hardly rejects all of Kant’s ethical project. Underneath his rejection of morality as a neutral framework embodying egalitarian values lies a commitment to the unfettered subjectivity of human ends and a valorization of human freedom. Even his attempt to reanimate a kind of ancient virtue ethic has to be seen in the context of what such virtue serves: the empowerment of the individual. Hill adds:
To commit to the Enlightenment’s valorization of human freedom and autonomy while abandoning its egalitarianism is to move eccentrically within the orbit of the Enlightenment rather than to shear away from it.

Hill's argument is that Nietzsche fits badly the notion of a postmodern rupture with the past, despite his emergence from Kant, the quintessential modern. The debts to Kant are too great. Nietzsche, like Hegel, was still operating within a universe of discourse whose terms are defined by the late eighteenth century and their repetition in the late nineteenth. This is no shame.But it is ironic in a figure who so thoroughly cultivated a ‘pathos of distance’ from modernity.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 12:22 PM | | Comments (1)
Comments

Comments

If the issue of the clash of wills and the possible decent of society into anarchy and chaos is recognised, then I assume that the need of a repressive state using its state apparatus to organise society into a certain framework is also thus recognised as it is the only means of social organisation. I find it quite hypocritical to thus move from one ideological framework (be it church, communism, etc) to another (based on a subjective notion of morality) and claim it embodies human freedom.