|
October 24, 2007
Recall the RBA's oft expressed fears that the Australian economy was being pressured by greater than expected price pressures. This was fear was based on their judgement that the economy was operating at full capacity constraint---strong employment levels, strong economic growth and rising investment levels. Yesterday, in an op-ed in the Canberra Times, Peter Martin informed us what the release of today’s inflation figure would mean:
If the quarterly trimmed mean comes in at 1.0 per cent, an interest rate hike in November is certain. If it comes in at 0.9 per cent a hike is highly likely. Only a rate of 0.7 per cent or less will calm the board, and there are few signs of one.
He said that trimmed means discarding those prices that have moved up the most and those that have moved up the least, examining only the middle 70 per cent. As their movements are unlikely to be unusual so they represent underlying trends.
Well the figures are out. The headline CPI rose 0.7 per cent in the September quarter, for an annual rate of 1.9 per cent. The so-call trimmed mean CPI rose 0.9 per cent in the quarter, for an annual growth rate of 2.9 per cent.The weighted median CPI rose 1.0 per cent in the September quarter, with an annual rise of 3.1 per cent.

Bill Leak
Expect to see the Treasurer and the Prime Minister latch onto headline CPI because it will seem to show that inflation is safely within the Reserve Bank's target band of 2 to 3 per cent. They will seize on this raft to argue that there is no case for raising interest rates in the next month.
However, the real question is whether price inflation of the trimmed mean CPI would persuade the Reserve to act to raise rates? The answer is yes. The underlying inflation is above expectations, and bumping hard up against the 3 per cent trigger for Reserve Bank action. Glenn Stevens, the RBA Governor, has assured us that the political cycle is no longer a consideration. Stevens told the House of Representatives Economics Committee in August in response to a question from ALP member, Craig Emerson, about an election campaign rate rise:
If it is clear that something needs to be done, I do not know what explanation we could offer the Australian public for not doing it, regardless of when the election might be due. I do not think that there is any case for the Reserve Bank board to cease doing its work for a month, in the month that the election is going to be. I doubt very much that members of the public would regard that as appropriate. So, should that data, or other data for that matter, make a clear case, I feel we have no choice; nor should we have any choice.
So a rate rise will probably be announced by the RBA the day after the Melbourne Cup. That places Howard and Costello on the ropes. The panic deepens. Can they still argue that the Coalition are the better economic managers? Will there be a number of rate rises?
|
Gary,
The Coalition's demoralised candidates in the marginal seats--- eg., witness the sad face of Kym Richardson, MP for Kingston on the national news ---- must be on the verge of depression. Will the big bribes for pensioners, self-funded retirees, carers and those on disability support pension get them on the front foot?
I kept on thinking of those on disability support pension and how the Howard Government has been kicking them in the shins for the past three years.
How do you spin that?