|
March 10, 2008
Nicola Roxon, the federal health Minister, talks in terms of root and branch reform of health care. Kevin Rudd, the Prime Minister, talks in terms of a hefty injection of federal money and a set of selective federal performance targets bringing the state's performance of their public hospitals up to a level where they are out of the headlines. The inference from Rudd is that he is not embarking on a basic structural reform.
Since Wayne Swan, the Treasurer, and Lindsay Tanner, the Finance Minister, talk nonstop about cutting back the federal budget and government spending to fight the inflation monster, I cannot see how that fiscal conservatism will lead to the 'root and branch' reform that Roxon is talking about. From what I can judge there is not going to be much 'root and branch' reform to provide better health care services in the first term of office.
So what then of Rudd Labor's reforming, modernising programme? What does it consist in? What is it trying to achieve? Are there dominant and subaltern elements of Rudd Labor's reforming, modernizing programme. Is the conflict between the two going to be managed by spin?
Will the modernising centre-right cause Rudd Labor to become the 'great moving right show' that pre-empts any substantive move of the government in a leftward direction. The left's old welfare state positions have been marginalised.The traditional left binary, antagonistic vision of an alternative future based on public health (modelled on the NHS) that is opposed to private health and the market has little credibility, and its appeal is now residual, a demand for recognition of what seems to be a social force in decline.
On the other hand the strategy by the right to ‘roll back’ these gains (via ‘modernisation’, ‘flexibilisation’, and ‘reform’) continue to make up the main agenda of democratic politics in Australia; but this remains stalemated after the last election when the Australia electorates do not vote for a worsening of their own conditions of life.
|
Gary,
One strategy being deployed by Rudd Labor is 'triangulation'.
This was the name given by Clinton’s New Democrats to the strategy of positioning a potential government between both of the contending political parties, including his own. This was Blair's New Labour’s strategy too.
‘Triangulation’ places a political leader above the party struggle (which is the nearest we get to political embodiment of class relations).