Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion Junk for code
parliament house.gif
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
South Australian Links
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

the charms of Wikipedia « Previous | |Next »
March 16, 2008

An interesting article on Wikipedia in the New York Times Review of Books by Nicholson Baker. I don’t contribute to Wikipedia at all, but I use it regularly and see it as a continual dialogue on contentious issues.

Baker says that Wikipedia is an incredible thing. It's fact-encirclingly huge, and it's idiosyncratic, careful, messy, funny, shocking, and full of simmering controversies—and it's free, and it's fast. This gigantic encyclopedia isn't a commercial product. It was constructed, in less than eight years, by strangers who disagreed about all kinds of things but who were drawn to a shared, not-for-profit purpose.

Baker adds that:

Without the kooks and the insulters and the spray-can taggers, Wikipedia would just be the most useful encyclopedia ever made. Instead it's a fast-paced game of paintball.Not only does Wikipedia need its vandals—up to a point—the vandals need an orderly Wikipedia, too. Without order, their culture-jamming lacks a context. If Wikipedia were rendered entirely chaotic and obscene, there would be no joy in, for example, replacing some of the article on Archimedes with [nonsense]

This is growing knowledge in the public domain and Wikipedia, which is a self-organizing, self-correcting, ever-expanding, and thoroughly addictive encyclopedia, is proof that open-source, creative commons and web2.0 works. It shows that the collective knowledge of the public (common knowledge) and user-generated content could be an asset.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:31 PM |