|
April 8, 2008
Leak captures the historical shift quite well. For all the security connections to NATO around Afghanistan Australia is really a part of Asia not Europe. This shift does not make Australia homeless, as the Sydney conservative Anglo-Britons claimed in opposing Paul Keating's Asia Pacific Rim engagement in the early 1990s.
It is China that has enabled Australia's ten years of economic growth, and India will continue to fuel this growth. Britain represents the past as Asia is where Australia's future lies. Out home is the Indian/Pacific:
Bill Leak
And yet, despite the long boom, each night in Australia, around 100,000 people are homeless. Some are “couch-surfing”, some are accommodated in the homelessness service system, and others sleep rough. This sort of homeless does not excite the white picket fence conservatives much, as they tend to represent homeless people as losers, (family breakdown) despite their rhetoric about the family being the bedrock of a market society.
This Way Forward report states that:
Almost as many women as men experience homelessness. One of the largest causes of women’s homelessness is domestic violence. One in five people who used a homeless service last year was a women escaping domestic violence. Half of all people who are homeless are under 25. Many of these are young people running away from homes characterised by violence, substance abuse and poverty. Nationwide, one in every 57 girls aged 15-19 used a homeless service last year.
Family breakup is a key cause. Many people in society write off the homeless ---and street kids--- as scum and welfare parasites but often they are far more victims than perpetrators.
So there needs to be some form of intervention to try and prevent the breakup; intervention in the form of counseling or mediation. The core reason why welfare services for the homeless have failed to keep pace with growing demand at a time when Australia has never been more prosperous is because the Commonwealth has cut its investment in public housing the states and territories have declined to make up the deficit; and funding for services targeted specifically at the homeless, such as the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program, has remained piteously small and susceptible to inflationary erosion. That underfunding has meant most of these homelessness programs are small scale and ad hoc in their outlook and strategy.
Thus Reconnect, a larger program targeted at homeless young people, or those at risk of homelessness, cost the Commonwealth just $20million in 2006, while Home Advice, another prevention initiative aimed at helping about 400 families, cost taxpayers just $2.6 million. Even the Howard government's flagship National Homelessness Strategy, established in 1999 to develop "approaches for the prevention and reduction of homelessness and broken new ground in integrated service delivery to people who are vulnerable to homelessness" received only $10million over four years in the 2005-06 budget.
|
And yet AI and other NGO's chide us for not giving more foreign aid. More patrol boats for Indonesia, more brand new Mercedes Benz vehicles for PNG MP's. I wonder when the down and out of Australia can expect to see Australian generated taxes spent on our own destitute.