|
July 2, 2010
David Bromwich in his review in the New York Review of Books of Karl Rove's Courage and Consequence: My Life as a Conservative in the Fight quotes Rove and then comments:
“To be successful,” he [Rove] explains, “an attack must be perceived as both fair and relevant, backed with credible evidence, and launched at the right time.” The half-truth here is “credible evidence.” Rove means evidence that only appears credible, evidence that sprays fast enough and drips far enough to resist removal from the popular mind even when the whole truth comes out later on.
The Big Miners campaign against the Rudd Government's emissions trading scheme and RSPT is an illustration of Karl Rove's point about dirty tricks.
The miners evidence--about the collapse of mining and sovereign risk--- only appeared credible, but it sprayed fast enough and dripped far enough to resist removal from the popular mind even when the whole truth comes out later on. There was no sovereign risk.
No doubt the "credible evidence" in conservative political history will barely mention what is left out---the truth of the matter--as they seek to undermine Gillard's political fix that has cut the ground underneath the Coalition's partisan bloodlust and attack on the RSPT.
There is no concern for fostering democracy or public discourse here by those on the Right defending their own self-interest.
|
You forgot to mention News Ltd's partisan attacks on the Rudd Government's 'greenthink’, ‘meddling policymakers’ and political correctness in the name of 'freedom for corporations'. News Ltd are about settling scores and left-liberal-baiting just like Rove as they foster a peculiar brand of English cultural conservatism with its themes about the tyranny of the anti-junk-food crusade’, public smoking bans, and the banning tobacco advertising.