Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

the political fog « Previous | |Next »
February 18, 2012

Apparently these are the worst of times. We have a once-in-a-century investment boom in the resources sector and an economy in transition, but the public mood is one of depression and anxiety. The Coalition taps into this despair with its rhetoric of an "avalanche of job losses” hitting the Australian economy. That is accepted as telling the gospel truth about the way things are, even though unemployment continues to fall and economic growth continues.

MOirAGillard.jpg

Another irony is that the success Gillard is having in passing legislation through the Parliament---eg., the private health rebate means test legislation and a bill to abolish the Australian building and construction industry court---is increasing the despair about her leadership.

Those with an eye to the marketing aspect of politics would say that the Gillard Government cannot communicate--ie., sell---its reform successes, or even the good news on the economy. The Gillard Government is generally seen as an anti-business and directionless government. It is weak.

Philip Lowe in The Forces Shaping the Economy Over 2012 describes the positive spill-over effects of the mining boom thus:

The indirect effects come through a variety of channels. Day to day, they can be hard to see but they do percolate through the economy. In effect, there is a chain that links the investment boom in the Pilbara and in Queensland to the increase in spending at cafés and restaurants in Melbourne and Sydney. This chain starts with the high terms of trade that has pushed up the Australian dollar. In turn, the high dollar has meant that the prices that Australians pay for many manufactured goods are, on average, no higher than they were a decade ago, despite average household incomes having increased by more than 60 per cent over this period. The stable prices for many goods, combined with strong disposable income growth means there is more disposable income to be spent on services in the cities and towns far from where the resources boom is taking place. As I said, this chain can be hard to see, but it is real, and it is one of the factors that have had a material effect on the Australian economy over recent years.

At the same time, the high exchange rate is having a contractionary effect on other parts of the economy, as it reduces the international competitiveness of industries such as the manufacturing, tourism and education sectors, some parts of the agriculture sector and in some business services sectors.

So we have countervailing expansionary and contractionary economic tendencies ---an economy in structural transition. Lowe concludes his speech thus:

...the Australian economy started 2012 in relatively good shape. Growth has been around trend and inflation is consistent with the target, and there are reasonable prospects for this to continue. We also have much more flexibility to deal with unfolding events than almost any other developed economy.

This kind of analysis has little to no effect on the public mood of despair. The despair narrative sees Australia in decline. It's all gloom and doom. This public mood accepts that economic doom and gloom makes sense, and it's insecurities means that it buys the Coalition's calculated rhetoric that the economic decline it talks up can only be reversed by the politics of austerity---savage spending cuts.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 8:40 AM | | Comments (10)
Comments

Comments

Treasury's argument---eg.,Martin Parkinson, speaking to the Senate Economics estimates hearings in Canberra--- is that the structural change being wrought by the strong dollar is occurring against the backdrop of employment growth. It is  not a collapse in employment from a global recession as happened during the early 1990s, when manufacturing in Labor’s heartland was devastated.

No one believes Treasury, the Reserve Bank or the figures. It's only a downward slide into economic-devastation that makes sense of what is happening.

it is "boom with gloom".

"the public mood is one of depression and anxiety"

there is a heck of a lot of whingeing from Old Australia. People---blue collars with red necks?-- are very grumpy.

Are the tensions between Rudd and Gillard over the role of the government in an open economy? Or is it just over who wants the top job?

It's an Establishment election-anticipating meme.
The Abbotisation process would see civil liberties overtly rather than covertly undermined and blatant socialisation of private debt with deep social consequences, after Britain and the USA, post T Party.
The timid journos won't rock the boat, what's left of the press is about to be gobbled up by the reactionary asshat, Gina Rinehart and the ABC is now Annabel's "lifestyle" ABC; an ideas-free zone.

What really bugs me is the growing use of the term "entitlement" to describe not just welfare payments but wages and conditions of work. Workers are now treated in this propaganda as a type of welfare recipient, and its deployment is widespread on the media including the ABC.

The other side of this is that work carried out without any protection of wage levels or conditions such as sick leave etc, is described as somehow "honest" work.

I would like to travel to this fantasy world in which he lives. In 1991 I took redundancy from Telecom on a salary of $52,000. I have seen similar jobs advertised this week paying from $44,000 to $55,000. Those on 7,8 and 9 digit salaries must have had some massive increases to account for 60 percent on average. The difference between average wage and the wage of the average.

Good point George.
Is it about who can lead the nation better? Because I think both will follow the same agenda. Or is it about who will appear to make less stuff ups and therefore look better on the 6 oclock news and then poll better?

Lindsay
That 's true, but I do recall those workers made redundant by the collapse of manufacturing from Keating's reforms were given the support in terms of retraining and reskilling.

Many went to university for free and got degrees. I know I taught some of them.

It ain't happening now. It should.

Surely there is another choice between Gillard and Rudd?
The health minister looked good on tele this morning,shes a woman, got half a brain, isn't baron(?)
Cant remember her name though.