Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion Junk for code
parliament house.gif
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
South Australian Links
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

'War on Terror': drones « Previous | |Next »
November 12, 2012

A report, produced by the law schools at Stanford and NYU entitled, “Living Under Drones”, documents the damage and terror that drone-strikes have inflicted on the tribal areas of Pakistan. The report challenges the idea that the drone-strikes that enable the “targeted killing” of terrorists, are “surgically precise” and cause minimal civilian casualties.

On the contrary, it argues the targeted killing program in this remote-control war has resulted in hundreds of civilians having been killed – including 176 children. The fact that drone strikes are so frequent has, it is argued, made residents of the tribal areas frightened to gather in groups, whether for a funeral or a marriage.


The continuous killing with drones does not eliminate violence aimed at the US but rather guarantees its permanent expansion. Mark Danner in the New York Review of Books says that:

There is much evidence to suggest that many, at least by any reasonable definition of “threat,” do not—indeed, that in as many as 94 percent of the cases the targets are “mere foot soldiers” about whom, according to terrorism expert Peter Bergen, “it’s hard to make the case that [they] threaten the United States in some way.” What is not in dispute is that these killings of thousands of Muslims, conducted by remote control by a distant superpower, have caused enormous resentment and hatred of the United States in Pakistan and throughout the Islamic world, a consequence that helps revivify and perpetuate the political sentiments at the root of the war on terror.

The War on Terror was successfully locked into the familiar political constellation of a four-decade-long cold war by George Bush and the Republicans by linking it back to the fascism, Nazism, communism and totalitarianism of the 20th century.

The Republican justification is that killing Muslim children with drones protects American children from terrorism. It makes America safe. However, it is Obama who has institutionalized the highly classified practice of targeted killing, transforming ad-hoc elements into a counterterrorism infrastructure capable of sustaining a seemingly permanent war in many different regions of the world.

Glenn Greenwald says that:

What has been created here - permanently institutionalized - is a highly secretive executive branch agency that simultaneously engages in two functions: (1) it collects and analyzes massive amounts of surveillance data about all Americans without any judicial review let alone search warrants, and (2) creates and implements a "matrix" that determines the "disposition" of suspects, up to and including execution, without a whiff of due process or oversight. It is simultaneously a surveillance state and a secretive, unaccountable judicial body that analyzes who you are and then decrees what should be done with you, how you should be "disposed" of, beyond the reach of any minimal accountability or transparency.

The US is continuing its steps along the path to a state of endless war and the powers and benefits it engenders.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 9:03 AM | | Comments (6)


The US has a terrorist threat because of its interference in the Muslim world and its endless war on terror.

Drones have really become the counterterrorism weapon of choice for the Obama administration. The CIA is conducting its drone strikes in places where the U.S. is not officially at war, including Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. The difference between the Afghan operation run by the military and the ones operations in Pakistan and elsewhere come down to the fundamental differences between open military campaigns and covert campaigns run by the intelligence community.

The military's term for drone victims is "bug splat", since viewing the body through a grainy-green video image gives the sense of an insect being crushed . Operating a drone is "almost like playing the computer game.

I await the shock and outrage which will inevitably follow the next "green on blue" incident...

Remember folks, they hate us for our freedoms!

Many of the bottom level soldiers in some countries are more interested in getting fed than causes.

The US govt is the most biggest terrorist organization in the world and has been such for decades.*

These 'drones' remind me of the use of napalm and defoliants in Vietnam in the 70s. The ecosystem and the people there are still, 30 plus years later, feeling the impact of aerial spraying poison over most of Vietnam repeatedly.
Horrifying stuff.
One of the great successes of propaganda is when the public accepts the unacceptable.

*And our government supports them.

"...And our government supports them."

Our govt supports them, with the support of the electorate. And it shits me...!!!