Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

unwinding higher education reforms « Previous | |Next »
September 26, 2013

Over the last 30 years, Australia has moved from an elite system of higher education to a mass system.

In the process it has also become a demand- driven system under the Gillard Government, which changed the publicly-funded higher education from being supply-dominated to demand-driven. Andrew Norton says:

Under the old funding system, demand and supply were only weakly linked. Potential students could apply to any course in any university. But the supply of places was constrained by government. Universities rationed places within this supply constraint. Typically, they used prior academic performance to decide who received a place. This created a market in which ATAR was the currency and the cut-off mark the price. Students with low ATARs often received no offers.

Since caps on undergraduate student places at public universities were eased and then largely abolished, student numbers have increased rapidly, by as many as 190,000 extra students. With uncapping, the system is lifting the supply of graduates to Australia‟s economy, increasing student choice, and improving access to higher education for disadvantaged groups. Universities start responding to demand trends in science, health and engineering by providing new student places.

RoweD university.jpg David Rowe

Norton argues that it would be a policy tragedy to recap university places, as it would make Australia‟s higher education system less fair, less efficient, and less productive.

Notwithstanding this, the Coalition has opened the door to intervening in the demand-driven system of university funding by re-introducing caps on university places. The reason is the link to a perceived slip in university quality---Quality is suffering to achieve quantity according to Christopher Pyne, the new Federal Education Minister.

Standards and quality have been compromised by all these new students. A re-capping of the system would bring these numbers back down again. Universities ration places by prior academic ability. Fewer places mean fewer lower-ATAR students. Capping the system, which would provide more per student funding for those left behind, would be a case of robbing from the academically poor to give to the academically rich.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:52 AM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

Pyne's position appears to be that there should be a limit on university places, and these places should be reserved for the brightest students, and not everyone who applies should be accepted.

It's a turnback to the university as an elite institution.

The more people that are educated at university the more who will be critical of the climate pseudoscience in the Murdoch Press.

The group of climate change sceptics promote doubt about climate change. They dispute the reality of man-made climate change and this suits their backers, including fossil fuel companies and those ideologically opposed to government regulation.

University education quality is declining, but that decline is a result of the federal government's cuts.

We have a a national public educational system that has been deliberately run down by the conservatives--- eg.,the Howard Govt--- to privilege the haves and abandon the have-nots.