Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

global economic governance « Previous | |Next »
October 25, 2008

Jeffrey Sachs argues that the international financial system is broken; an integrated set of reforms will be needed to achieve sustained economic growth and shared prosperity; and that the G8 leaders must go well beyond the issues of financial regulation. A true Bretton Woods II summit would set a financial framework to achieve urgent global goals in macroeconomic stability, economic development, environmental sustainability and trade for development. Who is going to push for this?

Keynes.jpg Martin Rowson

There will be no lasting settlement that is centred the global economy on the United States system as was Bretton Woods as we are witnessing the end of American economic dominance.

There needs to be something more modest. On Lateline Joseph Stiglitz said that there was a need for a financial product safety commission, a financial system stability commission and getting the economy going in the short run in a way that's consistent with long run needs of the US. The former, a financial product safety commission, would:

look at the individual products, like these credit default swaps, and make a judgment; are they appropriate for these, as I say, commercial banks that are taking care of other people's money.They might be appropriate for particular uses; for instance, if you are exposed to a foreign exchange risk you can insure against that foreign exchange risk, but not to gamble. So, one would look at the specific products and make a decision about what uses are they appropriate for, are they transparent, can we see what will happen?

The latter, a financial system stability commission, would:
look at the system as a whole, the financial market stability for the whole system, because what we've discovered is that AIG, an insurance company, was insuring Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, that the interrelations of the various institutions are so complex that each of them has become too big to fail. And if they're too big to fail, that means, and they know it. That means they have an incentive to take too big risks; and we've seen that.

Stigletiz argues for a broad role for governments in getting economies out of the crisis, particularly in America. His big picture solutions include calls for big public investments in infrastructure, education, and technology, but also energy.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:24 AM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

shouldn't they be visiting the grave of Marx?

One supposes there will be a many and varied rogue's gallery beavering away in the background, to ensure no such reform happens.
The ghost of Reagan materialises, gloating "self interest, self interest".

Paul
in a year we have gone from a situation where the leading supporters of the view that the global economy risked rising inflation, rising growth reflation and sharply higher interest rates to fight this inflation are now predicting a global recession, global deflation and sharply falling interest rates.
That is some turn around in a year.

One chance for global economic governance is the forthcoming summit of the G20 group of leading industrial and developing countries will be held in Washington on 15 November 2008.
Here the existing G8 states will face representatives of emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil and Indonesia around the same table.

I wonder what is on the agenda of the summit? Will the debate be limited to to the stabilisation of financial markets? Or will the agenda also include the question of global economic planning and governance for discussion?