|
March 6, 2010
I returned from photographing in Tasmania to discover that the SA state election in full swing. We are about halfway through the campaign, the posters are everywhere, the issues no where, and nobody is paying much of attention to what is being said by twiddly dee and twiddly dum during the festival season about "keeping the state moving". The destination is never mentioned.
There is not much enthusiasm for the politicians because they are not offering much in terms of policies and vision. Nothing about rejuvenating the inner city, nothing about mental health in South Australia or aged care; not much on climate change and rising sea levels. The only excitement is the sad faced, bully boy Treasurer (Kevin Foley) getting all hairy chested about his budget surpluses and eagerness to slash and burn the state bureaucracy to protect the state's AAA ratings.
What is offered so far is a worn out version of the same old policies and lots of heated bickering over nothing in particular (costings and dirty deals). The big issue, from what I can make out, is whether to spend $1.7 billion on a new hospital (the ALP on old railway yards in the city and return the present site to parklands); or to do up the old public hospital (Royal Adelaide Hospital) on the cheap ($700 million) and spend the rest ($1 billion) on a new sports stadium (the Liberals) on the site the Rann Government wants to use for the hospital.
Why anybody would want to retain the dilapidated Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) ----and, surprisingly many medical professionals do---is beyond me. The RAH is just too run down to rebuild whilst the clinical facilities are far from world class. I have never really understood the politics of those who want to retain the old RAH. Nostalgia?
The Labor Party will not gain seats at the 2010 election--it will lose some, but not enough to lose power. Some hope for a hung parliament, with independents holding the balance of power, as a way to bring some excitement to politics as management. Or maybe Tony Abbott can fly in and juice things up. Some political chaos is desired/.
Mike Rann has given the federal government’s health plans enthusiastic support saying he was “prepared to strongly support the direction of these reforms”. On the other hand, Isobel Redmond said she “would not be interested in handing over our health system to a federal Labor Government that has so badly mismanaged the home insulation scheme”.
|
Pretty good summary, but missed one thing that troubles me with SA; the sheer intensity of intensifying attacks on parklands, environment, open spaces and Adelaide's "commons" in general.
As to the RAH, is it so bad that it might not continue in modified form, with specific tasks removed to a less expensive new premises, where appropriate?
You see, we are not hearing much from Redmond. They favour the small target approach, but I need to know what they are going to do about about certain things, and I find the silence ominous.