Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

AFR: losing its independence? « Previous | |Next »
November 19, 2012

Has anyone noticed how the Australian Financial Review has certainly gone downhill in the quality of its commentary on public policy as it increasingly becomes just a mouthpiece for big business in Australia? The tone is increasingly one of resentment and open hostility to Gillard Labor's economic agenda, including investments in skills, innovation and clean energy, infrastructure and digital technology, tax reform and regulatory reforms.

RoweDMRRT.jpg David Rowe

The AFR's weekend editorial ---Gillard and her wasted opportunities--- states that the central tenet of Gillard’s speech annual Business Council of Australia dinner was that the government is the driving force of the economy. It comments that:

This betrays how Labor has its priorities all mixed up. There is no recognition of the centrality of business in the economy or of the role of the profit motive and investment in driving job and wealth creation. John Howard is right to say the Gillard government is tone deaf to the legitimate concerns of business. It does not acknowledge that its industrial relations, tax and regulatory policies have added to costs and risk, all of which discourage business investment.

That's fair enough as far as it goes since there is a legitimate debate about the roles, and size of, the government and the market in fostering economic growth and what kind of economic growth is best.

So how does the AFR argue its case for the market and smaller government? The editorial goes on to cast doubt on whether Gillard Labor will deliver its projected $1.1 billion surplus, without saying why such a budget surplus is significant; and it adds that the Gillard government rarely, if ever, acknowledges the extent to which China’s demand for our resources has aided our economy under their watch and helped us through the GFC.

I would have thought that the Gillard Government places too great an emphasis on the resource boom at the expense of facilitating the shift to a high skilled digital/ knowledge economy. The sniping at Keynesian economics ---government investment to prevent a deep recession--- is developed along the following lines

If there are grave doubts about the government’s short-term fiscal outlook, the medium term outlook is murky.The Gillard government has made marginal progress in tackling the culture of entitlement that is stoking the structural deficit, but at the same time it has made a number of worthy, expensive and unfunded promises, for example, in its disability insurance scheme. If Ms Gillard wants to avoid the complacency that she talked about in her BCA speech, her government has some obvious targets. She should make it clear it will not fund any new initiatives until it has devised a serious medium-term plan to deliver substantial budget savings to get it out of structural deficit. It should conduct a full blooded review of the role of government, especially in health and education where more private sector involvement should be encouraged.

The reference here is to government handouts and to big-spending government programs. There is no acknowledgment that the Liberal Party, the party of individual initiative, freedom and responsibility, deregulated markets and small government is opposed to reducing middle class welfare, and that it consistently blocks any attempt to reduce the subsidies for private health insurance. There is no mention that Big Business could not find ways to cut its subsidies to reduce company tax.

What we get instead is the line that Gillard is relying on superficial attacks on the Opposition Leader (political spin) to raise Labor’s electoral standing, rather than engaging in reform---tax, infrastructure, and workforce deregulation. The inference? Gillard Labor fails to construct a credible policy agenda to deal with the opportunities and disciplines of the next phase of Australia’s resources boom.

The real neo-liberal agenda --wind back the welfare state and start to privatize health and education--- is then just slipped in. No argument is offered why this is good policy.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 8:50 AM | | Comments (6)
Comments

Comments

The Big Business narrative is one of mining boom bust and Australia goes into decline due to a bad Labor government hostile to business. It is an alarmist scenario that many in industry and the media have created.

Is the mining boom turning to bust?

The standard conservative meme is one of the dismal, populist and doomed quality of Australian governance.

In The Australian Paul Kelly even tries to fit the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse into this narrative:

Rarely has an Australian goverment embarked on such a sensitive and vast project in profound ignorance of what it was doing, with virtually no serious policy consideration and driven entirely by politics.....Gillard's media conference last Monday was a serial exercise in populist politics and policy ignorance. She knew next to nothing about the royal commission she was announcing. What counted was framing herself as the arch opponent of this "incredibly evil thing" determined to expose those who have "averted their eyes" and allow victims to "tell their story"....It is, however, a perfect fit into Gillard's political strategy. For Labor, that's what counts. The media loved it - the combination of a moral crusade, a cast of victims and coming systemic dismantling of the Catholic Church.

Labor is engaged in the systematic dismantling of the Catholic Church?

Not even Kelly believes this , as latter in the article he says: "As for the Catholic Church, in moral terms it deserves to get the royal commission it didn't want..... the scale of abuse and anecdotal evidence of cover-up demands a strong response by the state."

The Big MIner's view is that the Gillard Government lives in slumber land. This is because Canberra is dumping carbon and mining taxes on their energy projects, when Australia's rivals do not pay such taxes.

Australia has become a high-cost gas and coal production country thanks to the government action and unions.

Lower export revenue means reduced government spending on social services, education, medicine etc.

The editorial is a reworking of government debt, “Labor waste”

As usual, the camp followers of business hector Labor to do things the Libs wouldn't or couldn't do. Let the BCA and Michael Stutchbury persuade Abbott to take a true middle class entitlement reform program to the next election, if that's what they believe we need. They saddled us with most of it so let them explain to the electorate why we can't afford baby bonuses and family allowances and health insurance subsidies and all the rest anymore. I might even vote for them.

Needless to say that isn't what they mean by 'entitlement reform'. They mean slashing the minimum wage, getting rid of the national employment standards, winding back unemployment protection and taking away rights to collective representation, so we can compete on an equal footing with those African companies undercutting Gina with their $2 a day labour.

Business will not be happy until every worker is employed at will, on whatever wages and benefits the boss feels like paying. Anything more just encourages the dreaded entitlement mentality. They know this because Mitt Romney told them so. And for the first time in a long time, I am beginning to hope Abbott might share Romney's fate.