Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

mass snooping « Previous | |Next »
December 9, 2013

The Snowden disclosures have shown the extent to which the National Security Agency--and its associated including the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) ---extraordinary surveillance infringes on the privacy of our communications and other vast areas of our lives. It has become readily apparent the extent of their disregard for individual privacy. Their motto seemingly is “If it can be accessed, take it."

Moirspying.jpg Alan Moir

The politicians offer cheap reassurances--- "if you’re doing nothing wrong, you’ve got nothing to worry about”--- whilst refusing to accept wrongdoing. The political class appear determined to conceal the fact that their monitoring extends to the electronic communications of whole populations. The conservative mainstream media appears to have a structural hostility to both any exposure of mass snooping by the state, and to the realisation of a participatory, deliberative or active public.

The quantities of data that are being collected are vast: so vast that there is no way they can be sifted by hand; instead the NSA analysts have to create algorithms that look for data that stands out and fits certain abnormal patterns.This generates the fear of a powerful and far-reaching security state due to the risk of ever-present risk of being placed under surveillance.

The political class say that the government needs a fairly free rein to act as it sees fit to protect the public because the ultimate human right is the right not to be blown up by a terrorist: in other words, accepting state secrecy in the name of security but at the cost of an end to privacy as we have known it.Their reassurance takes the form of parliamentary oversight of state secrecy and the ever-encroaching surveillance powers of the government.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:23 AM | | Comments (6)
Comments

Comments

That favourite phrase of the yanks... "national security" has been getting quite an airing recently. And nearly everyone gives it a free pass.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master that’s all.”

No doubting who are the masters of today's Australia!

Am glad am sixty rather than sixteen..the future looks clouded for humans.

"Their reassurance takes the form of parliamentary oversight of state secrecy and the ever-encroaching surveillance powers of the government."

The parliamentary oversight of surveillance has obviously failed thus far.

Many conservatives see the media (ABC + The Guardian) informing citizens of their governments’ acts against them — as criminal or disloyal.

The law enforcement/spooks sees any data source as fair game for harvesting. The NSA and GCHQ and Australian National Directorate apparently believe they are entitled to any and all data, all of the time, wherever they might find it.

They don’t think the public should know about any of this unaccountable and generalised mass surveillance. They are deeply opposed to targeted surveillance based on clear and understandable legal frameworks, made accountable by full public information about their activities.

Abc Fact checker sums it up.

Foil hats for sale $5