Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

the Asian Ascendancy « Previous | |Next »
January 6, 2014

As we know the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 and 2009 that had its roots in the subprime crisis in the US and the use of collateralised debt obligations or CDOs, undermined “neo-classical” economic policies, which had replaced Keynesian policies as the global economic orthodox. Neo-classical” or neo-liberal economic policies had been hegemonic for around thirty years.

Neo-classical policies are grounded in the view that economic systems tended naturally towards equilibrium, where markets cleared and all resources were fully utilised. What was required were free markets, private enterprise and minimal government intervention. The various strands of neo-classical economic policy essentially reflected a faith in laissez-faire economic management in the pursuit of long-run growth.

PettyBFuture.jpg Bruce Petty

The problem, as we saw with Wall Street, is that that enlightened self-interest does not always operate in the public interest and that when the private sector has problems ---those particular financial instruments CDOs became impossible to value – and therefore impossible to sell when confidence in them eroded---and can’t fix itself up, the only alternative is the public sector.

Thus Wall Street had to be bailed out to protect the global financial system, and the state has to pump the economy to prevent an ongoing and deepening recession in the global economy.

Australia survived the Global Financial Crisis only to be hit by the ongoing and deepening recession in the global economy. Demand for Chinese goods contracted in a depressed Europe and US, China's economic growth slowed, its demand for Australia's raw materials declined, the mining boom came to an end, and Australia started experiencing the inevitable downturn. So East Asia's rapid economic development and industrialisation that had transformed the region to Australia's north that had relied on Australia s resource riches came to an end.

Looking back we can see that the windfall gains of Australia’s resource wealth was not locked away in a sovereign wealth fund for future generations-- to help overcome the bust, ease structural adjustment, and climate-change mitigation. Instead we have the emergence of stage-managed public outrage and abuse organized by powerful political forces----a hostile political opposition and powerful vested interests-- to contest expert opinion as part of the Australian political process.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 12:20 PM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

"we have the emergence of stage-managed public outrage and abuse organized by powerful political forces----a hostile political opposition and powerful vested interests-- to contest expert opinion"

Yep, to hell with climate change mitigation. The miners want to sell their coal in the Galilee Basin in Queensland.

where are the digital startup hub's in Australia? Does Australia have metropolis for creativity-- a hotspot in Asia for founding IT companies and startups?

neo-liberals see the state as some hostile power, imposing its authority on freedom-loving prosperity-seeking individuals. Freedom-loving individuals need the big bad overly powerful state to butt out of their lives.

One way to reduce the tentacles of the big bad state is to cut benefits (welfare)

" the emergence of stage-managed public outrage and abuse organized by powerful political forces----a hostile political opposition and powerful vested interests-- to contest expert opinion as part of the Australian political process."

The conservative media may currently be the single biggest roadblock to addressing the threat posed by human-caused climate change. Their campaign involves the politicisation of science.

They run the line that all funding for climate research comes from the government, which makes scientists essentially vassals of the state.They imply that tens of thousands of climate scientists around the world are falsifying data in order to keep the research money flowing.

The conservative media refuses to accept that 97 percent of climate scientists and peer-reviewed research are correct. Instead their position is a denial of the problem.