Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

information economy « Previous | |Next »
October 02, 2005

In The Rise of the Network Society and related texts Manual Castells argued that a new global economy has formed. It has been kick-started by major breakthroughs in five areas of technological progress: micro-electronics, computing (both hardware and software), telecommunications, opti-electronics (advances in fibre optics) and biogenetic engineering. These technologies all involve the generation, storage and manipulation of information.

This means they can all be used together, or in combination. Each technological development supports the other, and combinations of these advances create new onward movement. Castells says that this raises knowledge and information to a new and central position in the historical development of capitalism. Hence the information economy or information society.

The global economy is now characterized by the almost instantaneous flow and exchange of information, capital and cultural communication. These flows order and condition both consumption and production. Thus a network logic now lies at the heart of capitalist production.

The networks themselves reflect and create distinctive cultures. Both they and the traffic they carry are largely outside national regulation. Our dependence on the new modes of informational flow gives enormous power to those in a position to control them to control us. The main political arena is now the media, and the media are not politically answerable.

The network society makes sense doesn't it.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:46 AM | | Comments (5)
Comments

Comments

The mass media is a left over the information scarce economy. Already they are seeing their power eroded. All the major papers are seeing their circulations drop. Sites like slashdot, metafilter, fark etc have daily hit rates that put the paper rags to shame.

The interesting aspect of these sites is that they dont editorialise or speak at their audience, they provide a means to engage in dialog. I could increase the Australians, or SMHs or Daily Telegraphs online hits by several orders of magnitude with one simple change. I would add the ability for readers to add comments to each story.

The mass media works on the premise of information scarcity. They are wrong. Same with record companies, there will be some darwinisation. The internet is fickle, and highly impressionable to fashion. Google bought orkut for uteloads of dollars but now myspaces is the hotness and orkut is only used by Brazilians.

Throwing money isnt going to save them either.

Cameron you write,

"The mass media is a left over the information scarce economy. Already they are seeing their power eroded. All the major papers are seeing their circulations drop. Sites like slashdot, metafilter, fark etc have daily hit rates that put the paper rags to shame."

Former Fairfax and Optus CEO and current PBL director Chris Anderson concurs with you. He says that digitalised communications technology represents:
"...a huge cultural change. It's destroying the mass media, no doubt about that and it's changing the way anyone probably under 35 now gets their information. Look at what Google and Yahoo and MSN are do the media, at how important blogging really is whether we like it or not. It's wrecking empires."

A good indication of this is the way that circulation is dropping in Australia as well for the big newspapers. And their classifieds--- cars, homes and jobs ---are under attack from internet classifieds.

However, in response the print media are buying up the internet classified companies--though Fairfax is finding itself increasingly under attack from Murdoch, Packer's PBL and Telstra.

In terms of power we should remember that Australia's support for the Iraq war and George Bush was very much a Murdoch-backed event. His newspapers shaped public opinion in favour of the war.

What if Murdoch opposed the Iraqi war? Would Howard have supported Bush?

Gary, I put in a pretty long comment in reply, has it got lost in your filters?

Cameron,
I've searched the archives under your name and nothing comes up.

I junk everything rather than delete. Nothing in the junk ararchives either

Can you remember what you wrote?

Gary, Nope. It was an excellent comment too, future historians would have been in perpetual awe at its insight. ..... or not.

I was interested in what your reply to it would be, but cant recall what I had written now. Must have closed the browser window on preview then.