Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Rover Thomas #2 « Previous | |Next »
November 21, 2005

This Western Australian Indigenous artist from the Kimberley region would have to be one of Australia's finest painters:

AboriginalThomasR.jpg
Rover Thomas, Bullock Hide Story, 1995

The abstract shapes condense complex mythological and topographical information into simple elements without the image ever becoming minimalist:

AboriginalThomasR1.jpg
Rover Thomas, Bedford Downs massacre, 1987

I find the way large areas of the canvas are outlined and taken up by a single colour-- in contrast with the "dot" painting style typical of Central Desert artists--very appealing.

It does make you question aesthetic modernism doesn't it. This is a modern painting that discloses a world, and it provides a way to interrogate and critique a Kantian-style aesthetics that is based on a representational mode of thinking and which presupposes a subject object dualism.

That's an aesthetic mouthfuI I know. It just signposts where I am. I'll come back to it.

I raise it because liberalism in Australia sees the pre-modern aboriginal traditions as holding indigenous people back, rather than as sources of strength with the potential to change and adapt. Australian settler liberalism places an emphasis on the virtues of material progress through technology and capitalism, and so Liberals have difficulty understanding the position from which Indigenous Australians like Rover Thomas are coming.from. It is very difficult for contemporary Australian liberals not to think that Aboriginal society is backward.

The art says otherwise. It questrions the liebrla view that indigenous people are disadvantaged and backward people who need help to be brought up to ‘our’ liberal standards and take their place in the modern liberal world of modernity.

previous

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 09:42 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

I love your insigts about ART, and you do "open my eyes, wide shot" again and again, and i'm thankfull for that!
are you an art teacher? you surely an Art LOVER...

The second image is particularly stunning. I wish you would elaborate, though, on your opposing this painting to modernism. Is it because modernist paintings do not "disclose a world"? I am not asking in an argumentative spirit--I'm just trying to understand.

From the little I know of Aboriginal culture, I'd say that the Rover Thomas paintings are exquisite abstract maps. In the sense that they are maps of actual places they are like the most naturalistic landscape paintings of the western tradition; but the artist also makes his representations into aesthetically communicative formal patterns.

Well, the more I think about this the more interesting it gets . . .

Joseph,
I'm trying to understand as well. They are maps of the country as place--but that means geography, culture, and dreaming.

At the moment my gut reaction detects a rupture between this indigenous kind of representation and 20th century modernism.

You can easily slot this painting into the modernism as abtraction of the art institution and many galleries do.

I think that this is too swift it can be read as an undermining.

The background is here That is probably why I chose 'disclose' rather than 'represent' by which I mean it opens a world that is other to our own one in modernity.

I'm turning to Heidegger to grasp the way this would work.

What I get is that this artwork can be interpreted as counter-practices to the technological mode of being.

It is illustrated here and elaborated here.