Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

young conservatives « Previous | |Next »
February 27, 2006

'The man who is not a socialist at 20 has no heart, but if he is still a socialist at 40 he has no head.' Aristide Briand

And so we have the traditional justification and explanation of conservatism. Why the split? Head and heart can, and do, work together, don't they?

PopcultureC.jpg That accounts for the old conservatives----cold war ones and the neo-cons--- but not the young ones.

But the conservative youth under Howard are different to the older conservatives. They are seen as similar to those the US blogger Andrew Sullivan called the 'South Park Republicans', to describe young iconoclasts who "see through the cant and the piety of the Left and cannot help giggling".

The term comes from the anti-establishment television cartoon series South Park whose heroes are four, foul-mouthed fourth-graders who gleefully lampoon the sacred values of the Left.

South Park lampoons the baby boomers who championed individual happiness over familial responsibility and promoted no-fault divorce. The young conservatives are opposed to the liberal-progressive values, or what is defined as political correctness. Hence the culture wars and the South Park conservative's views of the liberal media's bias and the intellectual exhaustion of the Left in the post-9/11 era.

The South Park conservatives do not adopt the Marxist view that capitalism contains the seeds of its own destruction. They celebrate the fruits of capitalism --- new cars, plasma TVs and trips overseas. They have grown up amidst the prosperity of a vibrant economy has encouraged the young conservatives to create small businesses of their own. So the welfare state appears redundant to these libertarians.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 07:13 PM | | Comments (6)
Comments

Comments

Gary, I would suggest that there is nothing "conservative" whatsoever about the South Park "conservatives". I would suggest that they are essentially a mob of punk adolescents--as are most/all so called libertarians.

My favourite philosopher pointed out 3-4 years ago that the film/movie that BEST encapsulates the current ethos of the USA body politic is/was
Beavis & Butthead Do America which is essentially about 2 emotionally retarded totally unconscious punk adolescents obsesssed with stuffing things in their mouths and screwing any and everything that moves.

Also regarding the famous quote re head vs heart.
Anyone who admits to that description is essentially telling the world that they are in effect already dead. A quote from my favourite philosopher.
"Love not reason, should make decisions.Decisions based on reason and not love are karmic.
Therefore, let the heart be your intelligence. The heart is unreasonable. The heart is mad. And the heart is the ground I call you to walk on.

The only way to overcome the murderer that is the cosmos is to love. Allow the heart to break, and BE that sign. Be a FEELING being. Then you cannot be murdered, you cannot be a fool, you cannot be deceived."

John,
they are punk adolescents who now run business, write media commentary and vote for conservatives.

A greater percentage of the young vote for conservative political parties and not social democratic ones. That is a big shift.

It would be nice if Australian political commentators developed some Australian commentary rather than just repeating American patterns twelve months after the fact. This was ridiculed in the US ages ago.

Secondly, Australian conservatism is nothing like US conservatism. The political baggage is different and the power inherent in the control of government in each country is radically different.

Thirdly, this is just conservative commentators seeking to make their cause just by latching on to another that is popular. The American conservatives have seen and acted as if everything is political. Latching on to a popular program and claiming it is conservative (when if anything, it is deconstructionist) is just asinine.

If killing hookers was popular then conservatives would be claiming that the new hooker killing youth is a sea change in voting patterns.

Cameron,
The context of this post is the the book The Australian published on the Howard Years/legacy etc. The Howard Factor edited by Nick Carter is
written from the conservative side of politics rather than a right centre left balance.

It is the cultural conservatism of Murdoch's Australian newsspaper and so heavily informed by the Fox News kind of conservatism. The Australian is basically a conduit for Republican politics to enter Australia, it is then shaped by The Australian and deployed by Murdoch's tabloids in the capital cities.

Why do Australain conservsative lean so heavily on the US? Because they have to get their ideas from somewhere. And the strategies have been successful up to now.

Gary, Because they have to get their ideas from somewhere.

Heh. These are the same people that claim there is no political cringe. It never ceases to amaze me how weak our politicians are. They are genuinely subservient and unoriginal in so many areas.

I am sure someone will write this generations' "Lucky Country". Then again it is probably stretched across numerous blogs rather than being one academic fellow pointing it out.

Brett wasn't too happy with the Howard Factor. Doubt I will buy the book if I can see the same cheerleading analysis in The Australian.


A good example of Australia's homegrown political heritage is Oodgeroo Noonuccal's poetic charter of rights. Instead of Australian Conservatives peering into their own past for guidance and a historical narrative, they import the failed idea of the South Park Conservative. Dumbasses.