Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

being taken for a fool « Previous | |Next »
June 25, 2014

The Abbott Coalition still appears to have one style of governance. Bash the doors down, yell at the buffons to clear a passage way and kick those who get in the way. It comes across as tactics of the bully boy throwing his weight around.

I cannot see these techniques being a successful negotiating strategy to deal with the Senate acting as a house of review. Trying to pushing senators around is just going to get the cross bench Senators backs up.

RoweDAbbottCars.jpg David Rowe

The Coalition's assumption is that once the Green/Labor control of the Senate passes and the new Senate takes its place the Independents and PUP will fall in line quickly and pass all the Coalition's legislation to wind back Labor's reforms.

They are in for a surprise. The new Senators are in no mood to be kicked around given the contradictions in the budget, its inequities, the slogans (“debt and deficit disaster”), the small government ideology, the lack of an economic crisis, and the use of fear as a sales pitch for the neo-liberal winding back the welfare state.

The cross bench senators can also see that the rhetoric of the " end of the age of entitlement" applies to poor people, not to big corporations like Big Mining. The know that the states have less money for schools, hospitals and public transport and yet the subsidies to Big Mining continue.

The Coalition's political strategy is to polarize a divided electorate, ensure that the right is in the majority, and so continue to stay in power. It's the US Republican playbook. News Corp can be expected to help the Coalition by using its media power to deepen the polarization in the electorate.

No doubt News Ltd and the Coalition will push a link between Islamic terrorists (jihadists), asylum seekers and Australian jihadists in the name of national security and defending Australia from the threats of gangs of Islamic fundamentalists.

Update
Now here's a surprise from an inconvenient senate.

Palmer's United Party will use its balance of power to ensure that the carbon price will be repealed. The Coalition's, alternative, Direct Action, is likely to go down as well. But PUP has blunted the Coalition's attempt to destroy the renewable energy industry. Some parts of the current climate change laws will be retained: the clean energy finance corporation (CEFC), the independent climate change authority (CCA) and the Renewable Energy Target. The Australian Renewable Energy Agency is in limbo.

What Palmer appears to have done with his intervention is to leave the key infrastructure of the carbon pricing mechanism in place. A market based mechanism can be dusted off and re-introduced at short notice when Abbott is gone.

What is unclear is whether there will be new investment in renewable energy, and if so, how long before it starts to flow?

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 11:17 AM | | Comments (9)
Comments

Comments

"They are in for a surprise."

Palmer will vote to retain the Climate Change Authority and his party would not support a change to the Renewable Energy Target until after the 2016 election.

The Coalition has problems

Of far more significance will be the Senate's approach to the "nacht und nebel" social security legislation they are trying to impose on the least privileged sections of our society.

Will they grasp that this sort of stuff represents the widening of wedge Asylum Seeker policy to supply to the underclasses here?

Or will they, like the Brooks jury, out of stupidity and/or malice ignore the obvious that has just jumped up and bitten them on the face in favor of meek complicity?

Maybe we can move on from the Coalition's political pitch that there is a budget emergency and that the carbon tax has caused an industrial crisis

will the architecture of the emissions trading scheme stay in hibernation until such time as Australia's major trading partners come on board with schemes of their own?

"Palmer will vote to retain the Climate Change Authority and his party would not support a change to the Renewable Energy Target until after the 2016 election."

The incumbent fossil fuel electricity suppliers must be in shock.

"will the architecture of the emissions trading scheme stay in hibernation until such time as Australia's major trading partners come on board with schemes of their own?"

The exact details of the new PUP policy are still being finalised: it is still unclear just how the party thinks it could possibly reintroduce an ETS or keep it in hibernation.

Where now for Abbott? It is one thing to have “axed the tax”, but quite another to have nothing to offer in its place.

Abbott’s climate policy is in disarray.

Direct Action was only ever a gimmick to get the Coalition to the election. If actioned it would be featherbedding big polluters.

The big issue atm is why Clive is saying "God bless you" at every media opportunity.