Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Bill Henson #4 « Previous | |Next »
September 20, 2005

This is not a picture of a landcape. It is an image of an interior landscape of the modern subject. The camera stands for vision (seeing) as opposed to sound or word.

Henson10.jpg
Bill Henson, Untitled #6, Untitled, 1998 - 2000

So who or what is doing the gazing. My interpretation is that we are looking into the unconscious----the dark continent. We are travelling on the highway into our unconscious that is ruled by uncontrollable forces.

Henson11.jpg
Bill Henson, Untitled #17, Untitled, 1998 - 2000

The images suggest that we are travelling into the darkness of a constellation of intense emotions of a damaged life. The darkness threatens to overwhelm us:--ie., our ego or consciousness will be overwhelmed by the violent and dark forces of the unconscious.

Henson12.jpg
Bill Henson, Untitled #23, Untitled, 1998 - 2000

Of course, not everybody accepts the idea of the unconscious, let alone the idea that it is structured like a language. They see those ideas as examples of blindness. Others see 'vision' as the root of the problem.

What should we do then? Keep our eyes shut?

previous start

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 09:30 AM | | Comments (7)
Comments

Comments

Probing the unconscious is fun. I'm really enjoying it.

The problem is remembering my dreams. I'm shocking at it so I only remember the nightmares that wake me up. They give me plenty of food for thought, but it isn't just nightmares going on. But because I don't remember the other dreams, it's always possible to be preoccupied with the nightmare. Keeping a sense of perspective is essential.

Scott,
the darkness for you is the nightmares. The dreams are the light.

If you consider dreaming as unconscious thinking, then dreaming is also active during the day.

Freud held that we dream for a reason; that reason is to deal unconsciously with the problems the conscious mind can't deal with.

He also said that the interpretation of dreams is the royal road to a knowledge of the unconscious activities of the mind. He meant that because dreams are such an unconscious activity they give an insight into the workings of the unconscious mind.


Freud's theory might be on to something; however he was writing a century ago. I must admit I'm curious to see what the latest medical research is on this subject, but I won't have time to look into it till the weekend.

Freud may have written a century ago but his theory has been developed by others in different ways, especially in France.

Most medical research is about diseases of the body not the mind. For the latter we have psychiatrists (medicos) and psychologists--neither of whom accept Freud's conception of the unconscious.

My partner, who is a psychologist, just dismisses Freud in a dogmatic manner. I have to say that, as someone philosophically trained, I'm not impressed by the dogmatism.

I know zip about psychology but I would guess that given that psychology is perhaps the least empirical, let alone exact, of the branches of medical science, I'm not altogether surprised that there are dogmatic ideas going around.

I've still not got around to sorting out Mum's library which was chock full of 'self help' books. She used to tell me about them sometimes, all full of the latest 'wacko' ideas from America, and seemingly all pretty keen to scratch the eyes out of each other.

I'm much more into empirical ideas when it comes to working with myself. When I'm dealing with a dream I've had, I try to pull it apart intensely and just meditate on it and look on it from every angle to try and find where the topics of the dream 'fit'. I don't know what Frued made of that, but I would agree that we dream for a reason; and generally my nightmares are about issues that are relevant to what's been happening in my life.

Maybe a nightmare is an 'alarm bell' where the unconcious sends a warning message to the concious that 'hello, you really need to deal with this issue'?

Anyway curious as to your thoughts on this matter.


You could try this as starters.Tis psychotherapy with a Jungian background. But its well worth wandering through.

hi...
i know no one has wrote anything for a while and i just came across this site whilst trying to find some inormation on Bill Henson. I'm writing an essay on him and wanted to know about his influences and why he photograph what he photographs and information like that. If anyone could help me out that would be good, just send me an email...
thanks...