Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code
parliament house.gif
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Commentary
Media
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
Cartoons
South Australian Links
Other
www.thought-factory.net
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

just short sighted politics « Previous | |Next »
September 8, 2014

The Abbott Govt celebrates the removal of carbon pricing and the mining tax and stopping the asylum seeker boats from reaching Australian shores. That represents a roll back of Labor's policies and the rhetoric is that ridding the country of a minerals tax will boost income and create jobs even though the investment boom is over, the price of minerals is falling, and the mining tax raised very little money.

The next stage of Chinese development will likely see its citizens spending more on consumer goods, and this in turn means a reduced, demand for the raw minerals from Australia. What then of its medium and long term reforms as distinct from the short-sighted politics and protecting the interests of the miners and fossil fuel companies?

RoweDAbbottAnniversary.jpg David Rowe

The removal of the increase in compulsory superannuation from 9% to 12% indicates that it has none. Superannuation is one key way to further the "end of the age of entitlement" agenda as it shifts people from the old age pension to superannuation. It's self reliance par excellence. All it has done is to cut the rate of increase in the old age pension. This is hardly forward looking from a government anxious to tout its neo-liberal credentials.

The Coalition's rhetoric is that the best way to eliminate the budget deficit is to slash spending, cut superannuation entitlements and ensure 80 per cent of the proceeds from Australia's diminishing resources flow offshore. Eliminate the budget deficit in this way----by promoting inequality and placing the greatest burden on those least able to bear it----will ensure national development and growing prosperity. The Coalition's rhetoric is premised on a morality tale:--a period of opulence must be atoned for by a period of austerity.

The economic argument from economists with respect to 'budget repair' is that if a reduction in spending growth is not achieved over the medium term, an even greater share of the burden of fiscal consolidation would need to fall on the revenue side of the budget, meaning taxation increases. The Commonwealth budget doesn’t add up. Revenues don’t cover outgoings. The numbers won’t improve much with time. It’s very unlikely that driving economic growth will solve the budget’s problems, given that small countries like Australia are simply too dependent on what goes on abroad.

Yet the Coalition's new spending which is increasing the budget deficit, suggests that it will not prove capable of managing the twilight of the mining boom by investing to develop human capital by educating the Australian population. Their emphasis appears to to be the low road of a low wage economy.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 2:10 PM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

Abbot promised big time: he pretended he could solve Australia’s economic, social and environmental problems with almost no pain.

Abbott has refuses to admit anything in the way of breaking his promises. The distrust arises but h encounters this with national security and banging the drums of war.

Abbott says he wants to be an infrastructure minister. But there is good infrastructure and bad infrastructure.

Cars are good so more road, and public transport (at least in urban areas) is bad. The most obvious piece of "bad" infrastructure is the NBN, too closely identified with Labor. So it needs to be dismantled. Same with renewable energy.

"as distinct from the short-sighted politics and protecting the interests of the miners and fossil fuel companies?"

Energy policy policy is borrowed from the vested interests – the fossil fuel industry – they are defining policy in Australia in the form of a a wholesale attack on clean energy and environmental policies.

Palmer's recent comments about 50% of Australians wont live long enough to access their super shows that he is A, a bit of a dill. B, Cant control what comes out of his mouth. Crap like this even turns dumb voters off.