Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion Junk for code
parliament house.gif
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
South Australian Links
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

the severed head picture « Previous | |Next »
August 13, 2014

Here's the picture of the child clutching the severed head of the Syrian soldier. According to the mainstream media the young boy (seven years old?) pictured with the severed head is the son of convicted terrorist Khaled Sharrouf, who escaped Australia on his brother’s passport late last year, three months into the Coalition's watch. It's all Labor's fault says the Coalition.

The politician's banging the drums of war are saying its iconic of the horror of the home grown terrorist threat and are the reason for the new anti-terrorism laws and mass surveillance of the Australian citizens, both of which require a lessening of citizens civil liberties.


This brings the threat of the civil war in Syria and Iraq home: our children are threatened by barbaric people who train their children to be terrorists. But the LNP stands resolute and firm to defend Australia's national security against the barbarism and brutal violence of the jihad terrorists. The terrorist attack could be any day now. That's the conservative rhetoric of the picture.

This is not to downplay ASIO's warnings about the domestic threat posed by Australians participating in sectarian conflicts overseas or the need to deal with any returning Australian jihadists on their return from the Middle East. It is to highlight the rhetoric of the severed head in conservative discourse's politics of fear.

This discourse refuses to acknowledge that the US, UK Australia and others who invaded Iraq are responsible for the breakdown and disintegration of the Iraqi state, at least 300,000-500,000 deaths, 1-4 million refugees, mass torture, ethnic cleansing in Iraq over the past decade that then triggered the Sunni revolt and rise of the deeply anti-Shi’a Islamic State (IS) in northern Iraq. Now the western powers are using humanitarian concerns--protection of the Yazidis or the Christians from the Islamic State --for another armed intervention, even though Australia's national interest does not require a major intervention in either Iraq or Syria. It's a regional conflict.

The conservative media and political drumbeat is growing louder to move from humanitarian aid drops and begin the military campaign to prevent ISIS from establishing a caliphate through Syria and Iraq. Won't that increase the risk of terror attacks at home?

Along with the external humanitarian airdrops to the Yazidis on Mount Sinjar, and a lifting of the siege, there have been US Navy air-strikes on IS artillery close to Irbil, the capital of the secure Kurdish region; special Forces operating in the Kurdish region, providing intelligence and aiding target acquisition; and a supply or arms going to the Kurds. How long before a US base is established?

It won't be long before the limits of air power is reached---air strikes on their own cannot do any more than momentarily disrupt the advance of IS fighters, and even then only where they are out in the open. As the IS fighters occupy towns, villages and cities, immersing themselves among the local populations, the advantages of air strikes – precision, reach, overwhelming force – almost disappear because of the risk of collateral damage to innocent civilians.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:44 PM | | Comments (11)


The rhetoric around the severed head picture implies mission creep from providing humanitarian assistance to helping (arming) the Kurds to defeat Isis forces to direct military involvement.

There swill be strong public opposition to sending in Australian troops.

We are already at the stage of directly arming the Kurds in their fight against Islamic State militants. The US, UK and France are already doing, or are planning to do so.

The Australian's position is that this is a clash of civilisations; that Obama should not have lulled US troops out of Iraq; and that the West needs to be prepared for a long war.

Murdoch's The Sun is already beating the drum for more military involvement in Iraq.

Australia will only send in troops if the US does.

So Australia along with the US and the UK invades Iraq, largely destroyed it,and killed hundred of thousands of people in the process.

ISIS have filled the vacuum by taking over vast tracts of Sunni Iraq and carrying out vicious ethnic cleansing against minorities in the north.

Now the Western powers are claiming the cause of humanitarianism for yet another military intervention in Iraq---this time to basically defend the increasingly autonomous Iraqi Kurdistan – long a key US and unofficial Israeli ally.

"The terrorist attack could be any day now. "

That implies that something awful is going to happen to us. We don't know where. We don't know when. But we need new counter-terrorism laws and to hack your phones and computers cos it's a 100 years war and real bad things will happen.

The picture of incarnate evil says so.

This is a reworking of the Reds Under the Bed scare to make us believe we're under siege from the baddies. Be afraid. Islam is the problem.

According to the conservative hawks who are out in force the US and its principal allies Britain and Australia bear little or no responsibility for the disaster unfolding across Iraq.

Nope its all Obama's fault for withdrawing US troops from Iraq in late 2011.

It's ironical issn't it. Not so long ago we were supporting the goodies (ISIS--freedom fighters) in their fight against the baddies (the tyrannical Assad regime) in Syria.

Suddenly we are fighting ISIS who are the baddies (terrorists) in Iraq who are massacring of tens of thousands of Yazidis and Christians. That means the Assad regime are now the goodies because they are resisting the expansion of ISIS.

The proposed strengthening of the anti-terrorism laws require members of the Muslim community to state their destinations, length of stay and reason for travel some weeks before departure overseas.

People killing each other is a great way to keep the population down which of course helps reduce global warming.