Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion Junk for code
parliament house.gif
Think Tanks
Oz Blogs
Economic Blogs
Foreign Policy Blogs
International Blogs
Media Blogs
South Australian Weblogs
Economic Resources
Environment Links
Political Resources
South Australian Links
"...public opinion deserves to be respected as well as despised" G.W.F. Hegel, 'Philosophy of Right'

the surveillance state's dragnet « Previous | |Next »
August 6, 2014

The increased security fears about the threat posed by 150 Australians suspected of fighting in Syria and Iraq, if they should they return home has given rise to proposed anti-terrorism legislation. This security threat does not justify the need for the Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) to access 2 years of personal data (metadata) about Australians; and to share “bulk” amounts of Australian citizens’ metadata with its 5 Eyes intelligence partners overseas.

PopeDTerrorismAsio.jpg David Pope

Our civil rights are in danger of being eroded in the name of national security. This surveillance, which involves mandatory collecting information in bulk about ordinary citizens' day-to-day activities ---intimate, highly private, social, medical, business, religious etc – without warrant, dismisses the presumption of innocence and accompanying procedures of legal and parliamentary oversight that are supposed to be the hallmarks of democratic societies. We have government stonewalling (both Labor and Liberal) on a more extended regime of checks and balances.

The new slogan is "Team Australia" versus the Muslim community that is supportive of global Islamist jihad fighting the West and homegrown terrorism. The appeal is to fear --the war on terrorism---to justify forcing telecommunications companies to retain customer data for access by government agencies for law enforcement investigations.

The ALP is not going to stop these steps towards a surveillance state that is covered in a veil of counter-terrorism, and arriving in a procession of Australian flags and nationalism. The ALP, under the Gillard Government, were moving towards requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to retain customer data for up to two years but shelved them.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 9:05 AM | | Comments (3)


The data/metadata distinction is nothing more than a sales pitch from the spooks and their allies in the government.

The government will require ISPs to create and maintain vast warehouses of metadata---that data needs to be stored on servers, in buildings, with people to look after it all. Those costs will be passed on to consumers.

ASIO is not happy with the idea that the rule of the law and fundamental rights such as the presumption of innocence should apply when it comes to alleged terrorism offences.

So they have come up with the idea that a person can be charged with a serious criminal offence - and any offence involving the word terrorism is serious - and that the prosecution do not have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they committed that offence.