Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

a visual regime « Previous | |Next »
July 19, 2004

In this post I mentioned the idea of photographic modernism questioning the hegemonic visual regime that is based on the transparency of language.

That visual regime was premised around light, transparency, homogenizing sameness and the objectifying gaze of the observing (humanist) spectator that saw the landscape as resources.

I suggested that Australian photographic modernism's emphasis on beauty, form and the celebration of the industrial machine did not put this visual regime into question.

SieversW.jpg
Wolfgang Sievers,
ACI Engineering,
Burwood, Victoria, 1981.

There is no disruptive power to the images of this Fordist modernism based on a naive representationalism. This is the dominant visual regime or the given visual order premised on the neutral eye:

SieversW4.jpg
Wolfgang Sievers, Bruck Mills, Wangaratta, Victoria, 1950.

The camera was the eye's technological extension and fostered the Cartesian visual regime with its emphasis on obviousness.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 3:51 PM | | Comments (0)
Comments