Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

What's the fuss? « Previous | |Next »
August 23, 2004

This report says that Frank Hurley, is much ado about nothing.

It says that Hurley, the pioneering Australian cameraman and adventurer, "fabricated scenes and doctored image" that he took on Ernest Shackleton's near-fatal Antarctic expedition of 1914. (That expedition has been recreated.)

Hurley had been on the Australasian Antarctic Expedition, 1911-1914 led by Sir Douglas Mawson:

HurleyF2.jpg
Frank Hurley, Sedimentary Rock Formation, between 1911 and 1914]

Hurley was primarily a straight documentary photographer:

HurleyF1.jpg
F. Hurley, Castaways adrift on the sea ice,1915

An exhibition of that expedition.

We already knew that Hurley worked in a montage way during WW1. What is the problem?

The Guardian article says:


"The poignant photographs recording Shackleton's departure from Elephant Island and the return of his rescue party in 1916 are both misrepresentations of what actually happened. Hurley's frequent use of 'artistic licence' was confirmed this weekend by the last remaining survivor of an Antarctic mission that was officially photographed and filmed by Hurley."

Photographic images cannot be altered seems to be the assumption here. So the manipulation of the images (ie. superimposing images or restaging events) is deemed to be fakery.

This assumes that photography has implicit connotations of authenticity, presupposing that the image is an unmediated transcription of reality. But Hurley rebelled against that view of photography as he used the camera ato interpret the world around him.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 2:14 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (1)
TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What's the fuss?:

» License from this Public Address 3.0
License Gary Sauer-Thompson wonders What’s the Fuss? (regarding “faked” photographs from the early twentieth century). His post provides an interesting... [Read More]

 
Comments