Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

the politics of pictures « Previous | |Next »
July 12, 2005

John Hartley in his search for the public in the age of the media in
Politics of Pictures says the following:

"Chapter 2 begins the forensic analysis of the public domain by tracing it to its classical roots, the Greek agora or Roman forum: the physical public sphere at the centre of the city state, wherein the public actually congregated in order to conduct political, legal, religious and market affairs. Now its gone; there is no public space. It hasn't disappeared but gone private and turned into pictures."

You've guessed it. Everybody's at home watching the telly. That implies that the media are the public sphere. Hartley is explict about this:
"Television, popular newspapers, magazines and photography, the popular media of the modern period, are the public domain, the place where and the means by which the public is created and has its being."

We sit at home watching pictures and so contemporary politics is conducted in the private and personal realm. But Hartley goes beyond the obvious media like television and the news to pictures such as record covers, postcards, musems, advertisements, magazines etc What we get is a visual sense-making.

They are waiting there like dead bodies/things to be forensically dissected and interpreted.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:48 PM | | Comments (2)
Comments

Comments

He obviously hasn't discovered, ebay, amazon, blogging or projects like this one. www.onefreeminute.net

Julie,
to be fair to Hartley The Politics of Pictures was published in 1992.

Though you find the public=the media repeated in 2005 by those working in cultural studies.

Though he does say that "representative political space is literally made of pictures---they constitute the public domain."That is a contrast to Benjamin Barber.