Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

fading roses « Previous | |Next »
February 10, 2008

I've reached the limits of my Zeiss lens on the point and shoot Sony R1. I cannot get in too close to a subject, as you can see here, with this shot:

fadingroses.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, fading roses, Victor Harbor, 2008

Pity about the out of focus, as I loved this shot. You can see the difference with Murfomurf's rose or tulip or coffee rose. She is able to get up close to flowers and stay in focus.

Another example of the limitations of the Zeiss lens:

pinkrose.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, pink rose, Victor Harbor, 2008

Overcoming that limitation means shifting from a point and shoot to a DSLR and a macro lens if want to do close ups of flowers as Murfomurf is able to do. I'll just live with the limitations in the short-term.

I need to put the money into developing Thought-factory-net, improving my computers, backup storage, and remote access, and acquiring some decent photographic software to process my photographs. That will gobble up the money in no time.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 6:46 PM | | Comments (2)
Comments

Comments

Hey- interesting blogathon! I found you had referenced some of my pix on Flickr- thx. You didn't notice they were taken with a tiny 8yr-old point n shoot which actually has a nice Zeiss lens! And fancy you being an ex-policy wonk! I have a funny connection to that, too. I've been a health researcher on and off for 30 years. Always HATED health "policy" wankers with a vengeance because I thought they were just jargonistic wordsmiths with no idea of what was wanted or needed. I vowed never to get mixed up with them. I tried to argue for performance standards in the state health system- got quashed by vain doctors who insisted their death rates looked worse on paper than they actually were, etc. Now I find that in the midst of doing a Masters in Public Health that I'm going to have to do the main units on policy because I can't resist! I guess I can get all fired up again while I'm studying them and just have to calm myself down again afterwards! LOL! No one's ever going to give me another job anyway, so who cares if I have radical views vegeing out with the washing up!

Kay,
I did know about your old point and shoot camera and your recent shift to a macro lens. I am noticing a big shift amongst Flickr photographers to the better quality DSLR cameras.

Re the policy wonk stuff and your comment on vain doctors who insisted their death rates looked worse on paper than they actually were, etc is one dam good reason why there needs to be some fundamental reform. There has been a denial about adverse events. Maybe one good thing that will come out of the Rudd Government's reform impetus is the states having to work within performance indicators if they want federal money.