Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

amateurs + professionals « Previous | |Next »
June 26, 2008

Are we going to see the Internet remain a uniquely open space in which people can create and borrow and learn? Will it break down the elitism in the arts? Or will it become just like television and be all carved up with advertising, where everybody’s directed here or there based on the presence of some advertiser’s investment?

My gut feeling--reinforced by these comments---- is that the digital divide has morphed into a cultural divide, which involves not only access to technology, but also access to the money, training, and time that it takes to be a full participant in online work.

MurrayMouth1.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, Murray Mouth, circa 2007

The internet has fostered the amateur in opposition to those people who are held to have special talent, and are separated, given special attention, and are seen as professional artists who "serve" society.The obverse is the tendency to denigrate the amateur.

The Arts Council fosters this denigration by concentrating much of its supportive work on professionals: using the term 'excellence' as a kind of euphemism for professional art-making, concentrating on elevating the top pros and the organizations that they work with, and pretty much leaving the amateur unincorporated art-making piece of the Australian scene off to the side. The amateur's form is the internet---YouTube or Flickr---and this form is largely ignored by the various art councils even though these are very vigorous and very much alive

The aim of the official arts bodies appears to be one of bringing more fine art to the Australian people” without encouraging more people to actually create. Amateurs who might like to dabble in photography, for instance, aren’t empowered by our society (or our schools) to do so.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 8:10 AM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

I see that the Australia Council for the Arts has been required to deliver an enforced efficiency dividend. 28 people are leaving the Australia Council through a combination of voluntary and non-voluntary redundancies, to help save $1.8 billion across the entire public service. The Council is making the shift to peer assessment panels through online assessment and other processes.

It is pretty much out of their hands now. Government sponsored art was to make it more publicly visible, especially the capital intensive art, with the internet that is not necessary now as public visibility of anyone making art, creativity, etc, etc, is instantly publicly visible through the publishing medium of the internet.

Cam
the new internet media--YouTube, Flickr, Facebook, weblogs ---are very much in the participatory mould. That is a powerful switch from the old media that only allowed us to be passive consumers of their product.

Now the Web 2.0 media enable us to create our own product.