Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Blake Prize: aesthetics « Previous | |Next »
August 8, 2008

Christopher Allen, one of the judges for the Blake Prize for Religious Art, has resigned from the judging panel over the inclusion of Adam Cullen's entry. Cullen's triptych shows Christ on the cross and the inscription "only woman bleed", a line inspired by a song by the shock-rocker Alice Cooper.

CullenAartworkBlakePrize.jpg Adam Cullen, Corpus Christi (Women Only Bleed), 2008

Allen, who is the national art critic for The Australian, said that Cullen's work "has a kind of deliberate ugliness which has been exploited as a gimmick. This isn't a personal preference, it's a judgment." He adds that the artist's work is "clumsy", "boring" and that Cullen "deliberately takes ugliness to the point of provocation".That implies an aesthetic position that art should be beautiful and morally uplifting and that ugliness is not a part of art.

However, as Andrew Frost points out, the Blake is founded on the belief that it "embraces diversity in its entries and … remains open to the many styles through which artists engage with the subject area".

What this even highlights is that The Australian has conservative art critic whose view is that art's only role is to be beautiful while reinforcing conservative notions of good taste and decorum.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:08 AM | | Comments (8)
Comments

Comments

Gary,
I think this painting fits within the criteria. Yes it is not a fabulous work of art and would probably look good on an alley wall somewhere but after all it is just an entrant not the winner. Like this years Archibald where there were some real shockers Allen should realize that Australia is only a little place. I think he needs a good slapping.
I cant find any reason in the lyrics of the song to call the painting that but thats OK I don't need to understand the artists thinking. Myself, I would of called the painting "The crucification of John Merrick"

B.t.w when someone subscribes to the feed of Rizones Public Opinion is what is subscribed too in I.E

It seems to me that religious art should at least communicate the Beautiful.

After the unconscious primal motivation of the heart-driven religious impulse is to re-connect and be nourished by The Beautiful.

Such re-connect being the fundamental requirement for all beings---and the only basis for true sanity.

Hence this essay which is subtitled Reality Itself IS Truth Itself IS The Beautiful Itself Is-----

http://global.adidam.org/books/transcendental-realism.html

Gary, I'll weigh in here if I may?
Art doesn't necessarily need to be beautiful or morally uplifting but it should be art in the first place don't you think?
It might be post-modern conceptual thought quickly got down as a rough schematic but as far as a painting is concerned it's not art in my book and it's certainly not even illustration . . . It is certainly not uplifting in a religious sense.
The critic made an action after the decision of the session was changed - he didn't cite interference but that must have occurred.
Beware - look at the history of this person's output, there are many hopefuls riding public issues, art history themes in fact who make a career (and sales even) based on piss-poor object making. Audience aside, collectors need to have their own clear cut strategies when considering buying this type of work, for me its 180º away from any sort of real art in my book.

Gary, The art that these guys do is more "religious" and naively honest than most of the tacky stuff that is dished up as "religious" art these days.

http://home.earthlink.net/~dr.chimp/caf

www.koko.org/work/art.html

John,
one of the iconic images in Christianity is Christ nailed to the cross. It cannot be called beautiful as it is about pain, suffering and sacrifice. So even Christianity recognizes that art can be something other than beautiful.

Mal+ Barb,
I don't think that Corpus Christi (Women Only Bleed), is a particularly good painting.It still should be an entrant-not excluded.

I was more intersted in the way those who hold to a conservative asthetic of the art shoudl be beautiful are only willing to play the censorship game and so undercut the liberal tolerance of diversity of images and ideas.

Fancy resigning because everybody else doesn't accept that your asethetic is absolute.

Les,
I see the problem re Rhizomes1 RSS feed. It does not have its own RSS feed. Something for tech support to sort.

Surely the whole process has been corrupted. Judges make a decision, next day one judge changes her mind due to pressure and reinstates Cullen's painting. Its outrageous. Christopher Allen should be congratulated for taking a stand. And I am sure the artist is loving all the attention and controversy.
I know artists with talent and integrity whose work has not been selected for prizes such as the Blake; but they do not have people with 'clout' in the arts community to make a fuss on their behalf. Its sad that the art world seems to reward the artist whose talent lies in self promotion and in whipping up controversy.