Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Landsat: Death Valley « Previous | |Next »
December 21, 2008

It's been a while since I've looked at the archive of Landsat images of Earth from space. From memory I had been exploring the earth as art archive.

This image is of Death Valley, which lies between the Panamint and Amargosa mountain ranges in eastern California. The valley is the lowest, driest and hottest place in the United States.

LandsatDeathValley.jpg Landsat, Death Valley, California

Landsat reinforces the conventional view that conventional photography is the result of a mechanical process--- as a mechanical eye to be used for the replication of facts---and so the creativity in the work is minimal. In reponse, many photographers reduce aesthetics to technique and craft; whilst others deny that photography has any connection to asethetics despite many Landsat image having 'significiant form' and rely on a lot of computer post processing.

vatnajukullglacier.jpg Landsat, Vatnajukull Glacier Ice Cap, Skaftafell National Park, Iceland, 1999

A core issue in this kind of discussion is the idea of science as objective and art as subjective and so on. Tis much better to argue that all images, including scientific images, should be analysied, critiqued, as part of visual culture studies that recognizes recognizes the predominance of visual forms of media, communication, and information in the postmodern world. Our experience of culturally meaningful visual content is that it appears in multiple forms, and visual content and codes migrate from one form to another:

print images and graphic design
TV and cable TV
film and video in all interfaces and playback/display technologies
computer interfaces and software design
Internet/Web as a visual platform
digital multimedia
advertising in all media (a true cross-media institution)
fine art and photography
fashion
architecture, design, and urban design

We learn the codes for each form and code switch among the media and the "high" and "low" culture forms. Our experience of images today mainly through photographic means, or images encoded as photographs. and we erecognize that digital images now dominate production of images in every medium. We ar emoving into an era of "post-photography" photography in which images and film imitate photography and camera-based images, but are entirely digital in composition and viewable output.


| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 12:14 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

Henry Holmes Smith, had plenty to say about these issues, all pre-digital too.

http://www.librarything.com/work/1016808/book/3384207

s2art,
I don't know the work of Henry Holmes Smith--other than calling for the openness of the scientist, so that the narrow conception of photography as object-centered representation championed by the tastemakers will not become its exclusive definition.

Another way of looking at this change is that the digital mediascape makes film photography status boutique and outdated--just like the old print making printmaking processes, now taught in the art schools.

This is the view of Mathew Walsh in What is the Future of the Photograph? in Big Red and Shiny. He says:

Photography, as it has been practiced for the last two centuries, will not disappear, but it may finally find itself capable of exploring its own very nature, its internal language, its relationship to printmaking and commercial processes, its surface, and much more in ways that we have not yet dreamed. Darkroom photography is not dead, it is just no longer the dominant tool for representing the world. It can be reborn anew and offer a whole array of possibilities to artists and our contemporary conversation. All it will take is a willingness to look at our history in a new light, to move beyond that history to the possibilities of the future, and embrace the rise of digital imagery as an opportunity rather than a defeat.

Film photography was one form of printmaking.