Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

the Big Empty « Previous | |Next »
July 30, 2009

The Silver City Highway in New South Wales runs from Wentworth, which is on the Murray and Darling Rivers junction, to the mining city of Broken Hill. This space or landscape is a part of what Elizabeth Farrelly calls the Big Empty.

09July25_Broken  Hill _021.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, on the Silver City Highway, near Broken Hill, 2009

The Big Empty refers to the dead heart or the dead centre of Australia. Farrelly says about her trip from Sydney to Lake Eyre, which she entitles "Mile after mile of big fat nothing", that:

Lake Eyre might have been the reason for the trip but really, I’m there for the dry. I like the Empty. In fact I love it. So intense – so present – is the absence I photograph it compulsively. Five hundred frames of nothing. .. And though I’ve never really bought the spiritual side of desert, we find ourselves arguing around the campfire about the delphic ‘‘know thyself’’ and what, if anything, it’s worth. (Personally I oppose introspection, not least on aesthetic grounds.) Only later do I remember that deserts and mystics go together like flies and doo-doo.

I also love the Big Empty even when it is awfully dry. Only I see my photos as representations of something as opposed to "frames of nothing."

What we see as the absence or the nothing is a stripped landscape that has been created by a pastoral capitalism created in the nineteenth century. The trees and biodiversity were there once. The sheep and goats--which is what I saw asI passed through the region --- eat everything----including the new shoots. The land is not cared for in that there is no replanting to protect the ecology of the landscape. Landcare is what is absent in this region.

Use and abuse for profit s the name of the game . That view is mocked as the black armband of history as being too “negative” by the conservative's national narrative of Australia's past as one of achievement and progress based on the heroic achievement of dead white males who laid the foundations of the prosperous liberal democracy of Australia.”

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:48 PM | | Comments (5)
Comments

Comments

stripped bare is right---such a long way from the richness of the country before pastoralism --a richness of colour and texture represented by the painting of Emily Kame Kngwarreye in an latter post.

Sue,
yep, there is a big empty in the sense of a land stripped bare by pastoralism. it is sad to see the bareness and the degradation.

Just to set the record a little straighter.....the land you drove through is part of Australia's arid/semi arid area, despite the spectre of "pastoral degradation" it has looked much as it does now since time began. The patoralists of the region have added additional water through windmills and bores, but there were never any more trees than you see today. In this region farmers leave ALL the trees to provide shade for their stock. It is not a cropping area where land is cleared, it is a sheep area where vegetation and trees are paramount to success.
The point we agree on is that yes, it is very very beautiful.
Regards
Fiona Ellis
Broken Hill

Fiona,
thanks for the correction about the semi arid/arid nature of this bioregion. I accept that description. We also concur that this region is not cropping land, and that vegetation and trees are paramount to the vitality of this bioregion.

However, I'm yet to be persuaded that what I was seeing (the bareness associated with land degradation) was not partly caused by pastoral degradation. My position is that land degradation in the region is predominantly due to over-grazing by the holders of the pastoral leases. The saltbush goes after heavy stocking and is replaced by short grasses.

I do not agree that this is just sheep country--there were a lot of goats and so break up of the soil's crust with their hooves. From what I could see, the pastoralist care of the land that you refer to (watering facilities developed by the grazing industry) did not extend to Landcare. I presumed that there are Landcare groups in the bioergion.

The only replanting that I saw was around the Darling Anabranch bridge ( I do know know the variety of the plants) and that was done to prevent soil erosion. What was so noticeable at that location was though the few bushes planted to prevent erosion were quite healthy, there were no such bushes behind the fences.

There were also areas/patches of the landscape with a lot of tree cover and this was not along creek beds. The question I posed as I took some photos was: what has happened to the low scrubland vegetation?

Peter Andrews, the subject of three compelling editions of Australian Story on the ABC argues that the Australian landscape has been completely mismanaged for the past 220 years by policies which reversed the natural order of the environment.

What Europeans encountered was a system which stored water in natural soaks beneath the floodplains, keeping the land hydrated despite sparse rain. But the Europeans thought they knew better. They – we – reversed the cycle, and turned the floodplains into unnatural drains, not natural dams. Erosion ran amok.