Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

beach erosion, climate change, Krugman « Previous | |Next »
September 28, 2009

I returned to Adelaide this morning from Victor Harbor without taking any of the planned medium format pictures of beach erosion at Encounter Bay over the weekend. The wind and the rain from the storms that swept across the Fleurieu Peninsula of South Australia were just too great for working on a tripod with long exposures.

09September27_Victor Harbor_067.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, erosion, Encounter Bay, 2009

All was calm and peaceful this morning when we left. The storm had gone. It was ideal conditions for landscape photography. All I had managed to take was a few snaps on the digital camera. Frustration.

On the drive back to Adelaide whilst listening to Radio National Breakfast about the economy and sharemarket I kept on thinking of climate change. I realized that I was linking the beach erosion to rising sea levels, and to the way that the scientific prognosis for this part of Australia just keeps on getting worse.

I realized that I was become ever more pessimistic. Paul Krugman in his latest op-ed in the New York Times asks: 'what is driving this pessimism?' He answers thus:

Partly it’s the fact that some predicted changes, like a decline in Arctic Sea ice, are happening much faster than expected. Partly it’s growing evidence that feedback loops amplifying the effects of man-made greenhouse gas emissions are stronger than previously realized. For example, it has long been understood that global warming will cause the tundra to thaw, releasing carbon dioxide, which will cause even more warming, but new research shows far more carbon dioxide locked in the permafrost than previously thought, which means a much bigger feedback effect.

It's happening now I thought. But it is not being taken seriously by Australian governments.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 8:14 PM | | Comments (4)
Comments

Comments

Hello

I am a student at RMIT University and I am currently researching public opinion on pollution and emissions trading in Australia. Would you or your readers be interested in participating in the following online survey?

It is completely anonymous and should take 5-10 minutes to complete. Results will not be published outside RMIT, however participants are welcome to contact me for these upon completion of the research in November – my and my supervisor’s contact details are included at the beginning of survey.

Many thanks in advance, Rose

Rose,
it's a nice idea. Nice survey. Question 14 is flawed though as an emissions trading scheme causes both job losses in old industries and creates jobs in new industries. It's both, not either/or.

Krugman offers reasons why little is being done.He says that climate change would not, contrary to legend, be devastating for the economy as a whole.

But it would shuffle the economic deck, hurting some powerful vested interests even as it created new economic opportunities. And the industries of the past have armies of lobbyists in place right now; the industries of the future don’t.

Nor is it just a matter of vested interests. It’s also a matter of vested ideas. For three decades the dominant political ideology in America has extolled private enterprise and denigrated government, but climate change is a problem that can only be addressed through government action. And rather than concede the limits of their philosophy, many on the right have chosen to deny that the problem exists.

He's pretty spot on.

A majority of Australians believe that the planet had been heating up gradually during the previous one hundred years, that human activities were an important cause of global warming, and that unchecked warming would threaten humanity. And, most Australians want government to do more to deal with global warming.