Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

a revitalised and rejuvenated Adelaide CBD « Previous | |Next »
October 27, 2009

Adelaide has had a long string of visiting urban planners, social planners, environmentalists, scientists and other eminent experts thinking hard about Adelaide on our behalf. There has been a history of good urban thinking, but no actual doing in to ensure city living and active use of the city in a people friendly city.

There has been a pessimism and anxiety about the future, a lack of clarity about where the state is going, that has lead to a retreat from constructive thinking about the future in order to dig oneself into the trenches of the past/present. The dead hand of Treasury weighs heavily on the Adelaide, and this has resulted in a state of paralysis about the city reinventing itself for the 21st century.

09July05_Adelaide architecture _141.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, mural, Adelaide City Council, 2009

There is no sense of Adelaide becoming a design friendly city; a city based on good urban design and innovative buildings; a city that is people friendly.

So the Property Council of Australia (South Australian Division) call for a revitalised and rejuvenated central business district in Adelaide in its report, Adelaide 2036: Building on Light's Vision, is to be welcomed. This builds on the earlier Adelaide: The Way Forward (2000) which outlined more than 80 projects, initiatives and actions designed to boost the city across a wide range of sectors. The response has been favourable.

The Report rightfully returns to Colonel Light's urban design and Jan Gehl's Public Spaces and Public Life: City of Adelaide (2002) Consequently, many of its proposals to make Adelaide more liveable and people-friendly are sensible. These include:

upgrading laneways across the central city, modelled on the Melbourne City initiative; improving public spaces including reducing the heat island effect through more trees, creating a linked, people-friendly city; an incentives scheme to increase investment in public art and the public realm; the central city should be easy to move around in, with frequent and free trams and buses, safe pedestrian and cycle networks and good visual connections; extended tram routes( to the airport)

They are designed to make changes from a car dominated city to a people-friendly city; one in which walking is the key to liveable city.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:41 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

What the Property Council says about Adelaide is so true:

Adelaide is famously good at talking about the design of
the central city, but notoriously poor at delivery. There can be no better case in point than Victoria Square. Designed by Colonel Light as a generously proportioned space in the heart of his new city, he included provision for a major Cathedral in the Square and no doubt would have imagined it would eventually look like some of the great city parks of Europe.

It adds that Light would be stunned to find it as it is today given over to motor vehicles, poorly landscaped, inactive for most hours of most days, difficult to access and virtually unusable.It adds:
The repeated failure of Councils and State Governments to
upgrade Victoria Square to realise the potential given to it by Light’s vision has become a parable for Adelaide’s ability to put talking over action time after time.

Victoria Square is a disgrace. It signifies the failure to reinvigorate our public spaces in the central city.

The way that the Property Council proposed building on the Light/Gehl urban design foundations was a good one:

Adelaide’s distinctive built form character should be strengthened by encouraging quality design which respects its context but is unashamedly contemporary. Rather than listing and protecting ever-greater numbers of buildings and frontages, or relying solely on podiums and setbacks to ensure compatibility, the Development Plan should enable good designers to respond to the site and its context using their design skills and training.

The emphasis is on good urban design. This is a sensible way for Adelaide to begin to reinvent itself. Such a contrast to Lord Mayor Michael Harbison's view to make Adelaide a “vibrant” capital:
At this stage in the city’s life, the single greatest thing the council can do is increase its residential population because that’s the key to economic success in the city.It’s the best thing we can do for South Australia’s environment too, bringing people closer to where they work.

He seems to forget that you also need to make the city people friendly.

the Car rules okay