Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

the weight of history « Previous | |Next »
June 4, 2003

I watched a DVD of Scott Hicks' film of David Guterson's novel Snow Falling On Cedars on Sunday Night. Scott had spent some time in Adelaide and went to Flinders University. I had seen the earlier film Shine and thought it a very courageous piece of work.

Though Snow Falling on Cedars is excellent in terms of form, narrative and cinematography, it was the historical consciousness that grabbed my attention:---the heavy hand of history. This was one of the few films I'd seen where everyday life was overlaid with layers and layers of history---the war, Japanese internment, childhood romances, exploitaiton and racial relations. The present was this history. The present social bonds of this seafaring community was shaped by the layers and layers of interpretations of their past. They lived in a circle of interpretations.

My response was very different to this or this or this.

Although the film talked about letting the past go and stepping into the past the present was shaped, informed by history. Our very communal being is historical through and through. So much for the possessive rational economic individual standing alone in their private sphere, responding to price movements and the competitive behaviour of other agents and seeking utility.

The aesthetic highlights what is forgotten by utilitarian economics: the significance of the realm of sentiments, affections, prejudices and bodily habits that cohere to form a social order. Economics, by ignoring the historical affective life of community and culture that we live everyday, constructs its theoretical systems on fictions that it redescribes as mathematical axioms.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 9:21 AM | | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (1)
TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference the weight of history:

» writing history from philosophy.com
Due to some of the previous postings I've done on the writing of Australian history I keep getting the odd email criticising my interpretative approach to contemporary disputes in history. The criticisms mostly come from those who adhere to an empirici... [Read More]

 
Comments

Comments

Beatifully put. And a fascinating route by which you travelled there.

The rationalist economics line is largely bunk. How is it that economists fail to recognise that humans make decisions based just as much on emotion as on utility? Yet behaviouralism seems to have no place in their theories.

Isn't is ironic that the subjects of history and philosophy, in our rationalist epoch, have been pretty well sidelined, de-funded and in if the rationalists get their way, de-legitimised in universities. I believe they should be compulsory subjects at the tertiary level in all non-arts courses.

Ah, in a perfect world......

btw, Snow Falling On Cedars is one beautiful piece of cinema, Hick's finest work. Its subtleties seem lost on many in this action-obsessed world where contemplation is seen as a weakness.