Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Elle McPherson: porno chic « Previous | |Next »
September 3, 2004

I saw this image in a copy of Vogue when flickering through it at the hairdressers this morning. Clearly there is a strong competition to establish bold and sexy brands in a marketplace crowded with beautiful bodies--most of them female. Hence the emergence of porno-chic in our increasingly frank sex culture.

Mcpherson1.jpg
Elle McPherson, Intimates

An earlier post.

All those at the hairdressers agreed that the sexy image was porn, but no one was fazed by it; even though they acknowledged that the image degraded and humiliated women. Or even when they realised it was a tv commercial. It was a part of Paris fashion. Everyone was doing it.

Does this mean an acceptance of the ever-increasing mainstreaming of porn? Or that the definition of what is erotic vs. what is pornographic is now changing according to the tenor of the times and what is being created in popular culture?

It is clear that porno chic is now fashion cool; It is more than a fashion style. Its hip.

How about this suggestion. These images are not degrading to women. These are the images our culture has given us as women, and instead of rejecting them, women embrace them and play with them.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 4:46 PM | | Comments (0)
Comments