Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Of course, we are meat « Previous | |Next »
July 18, 2005

A quote by Francis Bacon that I came across in Gilles Deleuze's, Francis Bacon: the logic of sensation:

"Of course, we are meat, we are potential carcasses If I go into a butcher's shop I always think it's surprising that I wasn't there instead of the animal."

Bacon, however, goes into the butcher's shop as if it were a church.

BaconFBlecher.jpg
Francis Bacon, Three Studies of Muriel Belcher, 1966, Right Panel

Though Bacon understood planet earth as a slaughterhouse on the verge of annihilation at any moment, he also blurred the divide between humans and animals.

Bacon said:

"Nietzsche forecast our future for us--he was the Cassandra of the nineteenth century---he told us it's all so meaningless we might as well be extraordinary."

If life is so meaningless then suffering cannot be made sense of because it has no meaning.


| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 10:31 PM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

Some unBaconian 1980s pop philosophy from William Gibson's Neuromancer;

"He'd [Case] operated on an almost permanent adreniline high, a by product of youth and proficiency, jacked into a custom cyberspace deck that projected his disembodied consciousness into the consensual hallucination that was the matrix. A theif, he worked for other, wealthier thieves, employers who provided the exotic software required to penetrate the bright walls of corporeate systems, opening windows into rich fields of data.

He'd made the classic mistake, the one he'd sworn he'd never make. He stole from his employers. He kept something for himself and tried to move it through a fence in Amsterdam. He still wasn't sure how he'd been discovered, not that it mattered now. He'd expected to die, then, but they only smiled. Of course he was welcome, they told him, welcome to the money. And he was going to need it. Because - still smiling - they were going to make sure he never worked again.

They damaged his nervous system with a wartime Russian mycotoxin.

....

For Case, who'd lived for the bodiless exultation of cyberspace, if was the Fall. In the bars he'd frequented as a cowboy hotshot, the elite stance involved a certain relaxed contempt for the flesh. the body was meat. Case fell into a prison of his own flesh."

Gary, Yes life and the entire universe is a slaughterhouse. A beginningless and endless play of changes and transformations---the dance of Shiva Nataraj with his foot on the ego golem.The dance being completely indifferent to any of the egos delusions.

One of the best Traditional understanding of this was the Hindu Goddess Kali who was/is a bloodthirsty bitch that eats her children, civilisation and the entire universe for breakfast.
Everything that appears gets eaten sooner or later, or perhaps moment by moment since everything is always changing.
But the other aspect of Kali was the inherent demand to be established in the asana of the primal transcendental consciousness or witness position (the place from where Primal Thought {Badiou} emerges is "done"). Such being the asana/dispostion of True Wisdom wherein that beginningless and endless play of changes (the klik klak machine) is merely witnessed dispassionately and allowed to do its thing/process.
As my favourite primal philosopher quipped. The Laughing Mama (from Coney Island) or Kali says that your objections to all of that dont mean shit!

John

Do not Bacon's images with their diverse levels and multiplicities speak to us today?

They no longer need be interpreted in terms of the existential anguish of the 1950s.

The sensation caused by these artworks about becoming animal make us shudder in the body.

Can we say that?