Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

Landscape at the NGA: Turner to Monet « Previous | |Next »
March 22, 2008

The title of this post refers to the blockbuster exhibition at the Australian National Gallery, which looks at landscape painting in the nineteenth century as it transformed from the depiction of known places to explorations of mood and time passing. This intimate image is included:

Van GoghTreeTrunksinGrass.jpg Van Gogh, Tree Trunks in the Grass, 1890, oil on canvas

The exhibition includes a large number of Australian landscapes. The key idea of the curators---Ron Radford, Lucinda Ward and Christine Dixon--- is that the Australian romantic painters----such as John Glover, Eugene von Guerard + Conrad Martens --were continuing British and northern Europe traditions of landscape; and that in responding to the Australian landscape these cliche-ridden and hack painters came into their own.

They stopped trying to imposing an inherited idiom and falsified ideal and started painting sunsets, the dramatic vistas with their mountains and seaside cliffs, and pastoral views that implied divinely ordained ownership of the land.

This view contest the traditional art historical interpretation of the Australian romantics that their fondness for the romantic sublime were simply unable to get to grips with Australian light and its anti-picturesque physicality. That only came with the noonday light of the plein-air of the Heidleberg school. What we have is an argument that is profoundly and strategically 'national'--Australia had its own culture and history--and which placed an emphasis on border protection not border crossing, essence rather than hybridity and centres rather than margins.

Radford and Co tend to downplay Australian exceptionalism and suggest that Australian art is a lot like that of other places.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 5:08 PM | | Comments (5)
Comments

Comments

Gary,
I've always been suprised by the negative reactions to the paintings of the Australian romantics and their exploration of the sublime in Australia. They have been forgotten or ignored by the gentile impressionism of the golden summers Heidleberg school, which is interpreted as finally capturing what Australia was about. It complimented Australian literary nationalism in the larger imperial context and it's reaction to a commodity culture.

English and German-trained artists reinvented landscape conventions to portray the new, and often startling, continents of Australia and America. These artists ventured into the wilderness and sought the extremes of nature, elemental and untameable: stormy coasts and mysterious mountains, volcanic eruptions and raging fires, the bush as evoking in the infinite.

Pam,
yes. Romanticism is usually interpreted in settler Australia in terms of raw or high feelings, the self against the world and rampant subjectivity that threatens to dissolve in the vastness of nature.

The sublime is ignored whilst the picturesque ---a tamed romanticism---is celebrated. So what is not realized is that it is no longer the case of spectacular landscapes that conform to specific 'imported' (British or northern European) ideals -- or keep turning to Caspar David Friedrich; or to the work of Thomas Cole, Thomas Moran, Albert Bierstadt and the Hudson River painters in the USA to understand romanticism in a settler society.

The sublime in these works signified an awesome discharge of cosmic
violence, an inconceivable vastness, or a beatitude of light. It is associated with the
the specific religious beliefs of the Romantic artists as they identified the sublime with
the Deity, with the Demiurge, or with the Being of beings.

The Blue Mountains is an example of how the romantic Sublime has been domesticated in Australia how Nature has been subsumed by Culture, and how art has prepared the way for tourism.

We need to recover a non-mystical or religious sense of the sublime.

Gary,
the best part of the Land of Plenty show is the second section, where Australian paintings by Eugene von Guerard are placed alongside works by the great German romantic artist Caspar David Friedrich and others by Carl Gustav Carus and Johan Christian Dahl.

It's not a question of whether von Guerard survive the comparison.It is more that Guerard is revealed as a worthy member of the German romantic movement, exploring the same spiritual vision of the landscape. He is not just a member---he constructs an Australian romanticism.

ABC2 8:30 tonight.
Matthew Collings reappraises Impressionism by examining the lives and works of Courbet, Manet, Cezanne and Monet.

Les,
Thanks. I missed it.Got back from the wilderness west of Victor Harbor after dark