Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

consumerism « Previous | |Next »
December 29, 2008

At this time of the year there are images of avid shoppers bingeing on bargains after a period of enforced abstinence due to their fear of impact of the global economic crisis on their lives:


model, originally uploaded by poodly.

The word 'bingeing' suggests that they have little control over their spending or rmaxing out their credit cards. despite the pointy economic heads saying a fragile capitalism requires consumers to spend big. So why the binge?

A quote that gives one possible answer:

....there is something so mischievous and naughty about the prospect of a shopping spree in the midst of a recession that is almost drug-like. Walking into a shop, finding a bargain and then funding it with a credit card fills me with a buzz...Discovering Westfield was like injecting a massive dose into the arm. The day ended with me sitting at a tube station, wide-eyed and filled with guilt, as I tried to squeeze everything into fewer bags in an attempt to look less ostentatious..... The signs in the windows and the sale stickers on the rails have manipulated me perfectly into spending more than I ought to.

That phrase "injecting a massive dose into the arm" indicates that shopping is like an addiction. Or is this the residual cultural force of the age of credit that has, in fact, ended?

Alas photography plays its part in "injecting a massive dose into the arm" of the consumer. So an art photography needs to take an oppostional stance to this visual injection.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:58 AM | | Comments (5)
Comments

Comments

I did the Xmas sales thingy after Boxing Day and I spent far more than I should have on clothes. I don't feel good about it, despite looking at all the "bargains" I'd purchased. I got carried away in enjoying myself shopping for Australia. Now I am depressed at how long it is going to take me to pay off the credit card.

How can art take any kind of real stance against consumerism? Part of the existence of art is based on people's desire to possess it - we show what we want to possess by how many cotton-linen-fiber-papers we are willing to exchange for a given product, or in this case, piece of art.

So how? How does one actively take a stance against the drug of consumerism while understanding and realizing the constraints it places upon the piece of art before it is even conceived?

Lauren,
culture protests at all values being reduced to the value of profit and unlimited accumulation. It defends other values, even though it is caught up in the market. So the critical edge is there.

Jeff Koons' work incorporating vacuum cleaners, basketballs and sports posters is often interpreted as saying that it is impossible to make art that transcends its inevitable commodification--its abstraction into saleable forms as signature styes or brand-name objects.

Therefore art can no longer play a part in changing/transforming life--the original goal of the modernist avant garde--by confronting society with originality and different visions that transcend the status quo. Art can only enact the predetermined fact of its commodification.

Pam
Conceptual Art reacted against the commodification of art--- it attempted a subversion of the gallery or museum as the location and determiner of art, and the art market as the owner and distributor of art.