Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

towards e-books « Previous | |Next »
December 9, 2008

I've been considering building two of my embryonic photography projects---on the River Murray and Port Adelaide ---- into electronic books with text and photographs. That requires special software. What sort?

08November20_Port Adelaide  _107.jpg Gary Sauer-Thompson, Port Adelaide, South Australia, 2008

I'm not sure how to go about creating an e-photobook with text. But it is the next step, as I have some text and pictures that explore image-text relations viewed as a site of conflict. It is the conflict that is crucial given the development versus the environment struggle that has been played out in these two projects. So the nexus is where political, institutional, and social antagonisms play themselves out in the materiality of representation.

Theorists, such as W. J. T. Mitchell in Picture Theory: Essays on Visual and Verbal Representation, argue that the postmodern mode of representation is one which represses language and absorbs it into image. According to Mitchell we live in a culture dominated by pictorial image, yet we remain unable to understand the power of the picture, even though the pictures themselves form a point or site of friction and discomfort.

Consequently, we need to avoid the tacit binary theories of the Image/text" relation: the photographers and visual artists who reduce every to image and make the text empty and those in the literary world who see the image as an illustration of the text. Each is a black hole for the other. Thus photographs were once seen to just look like the world: we can see what a picture is of without having to learn any codes---a naïve mimesis, copy or correspondence theories of representation, or a renewed metaphysics of pictorial ‘presence’ in which the picture has the capacity to transport a viewer to a state of being that both precedes and elides language.

If the dominant theory in our culture is a too linguistic interpretation of images that hinders "visual literacy", then we need to begin from the tensions and paradoxes that exist between visual and verbal representations in the mass-circulated global corporate culture in which we now find ourselves.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 7:13 AM | | Comments (3)
Comments

Comments

Mitchell is interesting. He thinks in terms of a visual culture and the "pictorial turn" in which the long domination of the printed book is giving way to cinema, video, and other forms of multimedia as the determining influences in our culture.

Mitchell works in terms of the domain of images across the media, including literature and language as well as scientific discourse and the visual arts. By ‘image’ he means works of art, products of mass culture, or ordinary functional images such as the images of sexual identity on lavatories or the icons on a computer desktop. Iconology addresses the entire field of visual (and verbal) images, of which the realm of artistic images is a small and distinct subfield.

I kinda like Mitchell's idea of the pictorial turn----that the pictures that surround us do not only transform our world and identity, but also form them more and more. In this way pictures are playing a more and more important role in the construction of our social reality.

It is a way to counter the structuralist and post-structuralist interpretations dealing with textual metaphors oppress pictures and want to rule them.Their notion of inter-textuality of the new interpretations completely buries the picture and pictorialness under itself.

Most would agree now that images cannot and should not be reduced to legible texts, and that to do so would constitute a reductive approach to photography.

I don't agree with Mitchell's linking of the pictorial turn to the end of postmodernism. The pictorial turn was, i already well under way, and was one part of the postmodern.