Thought-Factory.net Philosophical Conversations Public Opinion philosophy.com Junk for code

Mandy Martin, Puritjarra 2, 2005. For further information on MANDY MARTIN, refer here: http://www.mandy-martin.com/
If there are diverse kinds of knowledge and ways of knowing place, then we need to learn to value the different ways each of us sees a single place that is significant, but differently so, for each perspective.
RECENT ENTRIES
SEARCH
ARCHIVES
Library
Thinkers/Critics/etc
WEBLOGS
Australian Weblogs
Critical commentary
Visual blogs
CULTURE
ART
PHOTOGRAPHY
DESIGN/STREET ART
ARCHITECTURE/CITY
Film
MUSIC
Sexuality
FOOD & WiNE
Other
www.thought-factory.net
looking for something firm in a world of chaotic flux

when nudity = pornography « Previous | |Next »
January 6, 2011

The Sydney Children's Hospital Foundation took exception to the image by Archibald prize winner Del Kathryn Barton of her six-year-old son, Kell that was part of a charity of works of Australian artists. Del Kathryn Barton won the Archibald prize in 2008 with You Are What Is Most Beautiful About Me, A Self Portrait With Kell And Arella her son and daughter.

The reason given is that the image does not comply with the hospital's strict rules on images of children---its visual protocols.

BartonDKKell.jpg Del Kathryn Barton, Eye Land of Kell, 2010

Is this another instance of nudity being conflated with pornography--based on conservative concerns about the sexualization of children's innocence and images for pedophiles? The photograph is clearly not pornographic---it looks appropriate for a charity trying to raise money for the hospital. The googly eyes are plastered over the skin like ocular measles.

Robert Nelson says that after the Bill Henson affair children in art are to be regulated by protocols devised by the Australia Council to organise to ensure, first, that artists obey the law and, second, that children not be exploited in art.

He says that the problem is 'exploitation' as the government and its instrumentalities:

don't have to name or prove any ill-consequence that results from an artwork. They can obstruct creative work on the basis of "preventing exploitation" without ever feeling a need to show how someone might be exploited...The Sydney hospital won't be able to produce a sheet that indicates in one column what damage Barton's picture could possibly do, with the chances of that event happening entered in the other column.

Cultural conservatives see the harm in terms of pedophilia-is-everywhere and sexual exploitation and an occasion to denounce contemporary art. Their narrative is one of moral decline and sex is their bete noire.

| Posted by Gary Sauer-Thompson at 6:54 AM | | Comments (1)
Comments

Comments

The hospital has the role of making people well. It is not a gallery that seeks to enter the debate of what is right or wrong on this subject. It is likely to offend some so a picture of a tree is better for them.